Left Ventricular Safety Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cardiac resynchronization therapy devices are inadequate for delivering optimal multi-site left ventricular pacing, requiring modifications in refractory period management, left ventricular protective periods, and biventricular-triggered pacing modes to ensure safe and effective ventricular synchronization in heart failure patients.

Innovation Solution

The development of an implantable pacing device with advanced programmable electronic controller and circuitry that manages refractory periods, implements a left ventricular protective period, and switches between left ventricle-only and biventricular-triggered pacing modes to optimize multi-site left ventricular pacing, using a switch matrix to configure sensing and pacing channels and incorporating minute ventilation and activity level sensors for adaptive pacing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multi-site left ventricular pacing is implemented, then ventricular synchronization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventricular synchronizationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the left ventricular pacing function into multiple independent pacing sites (LV1, LV2, etc.), each with its own refractory period management. This segmentation allows optimized resynchronization therapy by selectively pacing different LV segments while maintaining manageable device complexity through modular control architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements nested refractory period structures where a global LV refractory period contains site-specific refractory periods. This nested approach allows comprehensive LV protection while enabling precise control at individual pacing sites, resolving the contradiction between enhanced synchronization and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Reliability

If left ventricular protective period is implemented, then arrhythmia risks are reduced, but pacing efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvearrhythmia risksVSAvoidpacing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic refractory period management where the LV protective period duration and applicability are adjusted based on real-time detection of arrhythmia risk conditions. The controller dynamically extends or reduces protection periods and selectively applies them to specific pacing sites, maintaining safety while optimizing pacing efficiency through adaptive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If refractory period management is modified for multi-site pacing, then ventricular synchronization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveventricular synchronizationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different refractory period management strategies to different LV pacing sites based on their specific operational characteristics and arrhythmia risk profiles. Each pacing site can have customized refractory period settings, allowing optimized local control while maintaining overall system manageability through localized rather than universal complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If advanced programmable controller and circuitry are incorporated, then pacing optimization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacing optimizationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal programmable controller architecture that handles multiple pacing modes (LV-only, biventricular-triggered), refractory period management, and protective period implementation through a single integrated control system. This multi-functional approach achieves comprehensive pacing optimization while avoiding the complexity increase that would result from separate dedicated circuits for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP2654885B1Left ventricle-only and right ventricular safety pacing
Publication Date: 2016.02.24 CARDIAC PACEMAKERS INC
  • EP2654885B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2654885B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2654885B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

One way in which cardiac resynchronization therapy may be delivered is to only deliver paces to the left ventricle. If left ventricular pacing is inhibited during a cardiac cycle, it may be desirable to deliver a right ventricular safety pace to prevent asystole. Methods and devices for implementing right ventricular safety pacing in the context of multi-site left ventricular-only pacing are described.