LVDS Driver Circuit Using Dynamic Current Mirrors at Low Voltage

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional differential signaling circuits, such as LVDS, face limitations in output range due to insufficient headroom in current sources as supply voltages decrease, restricting their application in modern low-voltage circuits.

Innovation Solution

The proposed LVDS driving circuit employs transistors as both current sources and sinks, forming current mirrors based on data signal logic levels to dynamically control current flow, eliminating the need for separate current sources and sinks, thereby increasing output range and flexibility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If conventional current sources are used in differential signaling circuits, then the circuit can maintain stable operation, but the output range becomes very limited due to insufficient headroom as supply voltage decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoutput rangeVSAvoidcircuit structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the functions of current sources and current sinks into a single transistor structure. The transistor operates in different regions (linear region for current source mode, saturation region for current sink mode) based on control signals, eliminating the need for separate current source and sink circuits. This merging approach increases output range while managing circuit complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic operation where transistors switch between different functional modes (current source vs. current sink) based on data signal logic levels. The circuit dynamically adjusts which transistor acts as source or sink, enabling broader output voltage range that adapts to varying supply voltages and signal requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If separate current sources and sinks are used, then the circuit operation is stable, but the manufacturing cost increases and the circuit structure becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecircuit operation stabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple current control functions into fewer transistor structures. By using transistors that can dynamically function as either current sources or sinks based on control signals, the circuit reduces the total component count while maintaining stable operation through controlled region switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates multi-functional transistors that can serve different purposes (current source or current sink) depending on operating conditions and control signals. This universality reduces the number of specialized components needed, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining circuit reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If transistors are used as both current sources and sinks with dynamic control, then the output range and operating speed increase, but the circuit control complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating speedVSAvoidcontrol mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses dynamic switching based on data signal logic levels to control transistor function. XOR gates generate control signals that dynamically switch transistors between current source and sink modes, enabling high-speed operation while the control logic remains relatively simple and systematic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs symmetric control structures where identical circuit blocks (XOR gates, transistor pairs) are replicated and coordinated through complementary control signals. This copying approach manages control complexity by using repeated, standardized control patterns rather than unique control logic for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS9362917B1Low voltage differential signaling (LVDS) driving circuit
Publication Date: 2016.06.07 VIA ALLIANCE SEMICON CO LTD
  • US9362917B1 patent drawing
  • US9362917B1 patent drawing
  • US9362917B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An LVDS (Low Voltage Differential Signaling) driving circuit includes a first transistor, a second transistor, a third transistor, a fourth transistor, a first resistor, a second resistor, and a bias driver. The first transistor is coupled between a supply voltage and a first node. The second transistor is coupled between the supply voltage and a second node. The third transistor is coupled between the first node and a ground voltage. The fourth transistor is coupled between the second node and the ground voltage. The first resistor is coupled between the first node and a third node. The second resistor is coupled between the second node and the third node. The bias driver generates bias signals for controlling the first, second, third, and fourth transistors according to a data signal.