B-Cell Lymphoma Responsiveness Prediction via Marker Gene Expression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a need to identify predictive markers for the responsiveness of B-cell lymphoma patients to anti-CD40 antibody therapy, as not all B lymphoma cells are sensitive to anti-CD40 antibody-mediated cell death.

Innovation Solution

The method involves comparing the measured expression levels of specific marker genes such as UAP1, BTG2, CD40, VNN2, RGS13, CD22, IFITM1, CTSC, CD44, PUS7, BCL6, EPDR1, IGF1R, and CD79B in B-cell lymphoma samples to a reference level to predict responsiveness to anti-CD40 antibody treatment, using techniques like real-time quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If anti-CD40 antibody therapy is administered to all B-cell lymphoma patients, then treatment coverage is maximized, but treatment effectiveness is reduced due to variable responsiveness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment effectivenessVSAvoidtreatment coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by measuring marker gene expression levels (such as CD40, BCL6, IGF1R, and other biomarkers) before initiating anti-CD40 antibody therapy. This pre-treatment assessment allows clinicians to identify patients most likely to respond to the therapy, ensuring that treatment is administered to the right population before starting the therapeutic regimen, thereby maximizing treatment effectiveness while maintaining appropriate coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If marker gene expression analysis is performed to predict treatment responsiveness, then treatment precision is improved, but diagnostic complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness prediction accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic procedure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies segmentation by dividing the diagnostic process into distinct, manageable components: (1) measuring expression levels of specific marker genes (CD40, BCL6, IGF1R, etc.), (2) comparing measured levels to established thresholds, and (3) generating a responsiveness prediction. This segmented approach allows for systematic implementation of precise diagnostics while maintaining procedural clarity and reducing overall diagnostic complexity through structured analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If multiple marker genes are analyzed to improve prediction accuracy, then responsiveness assessment precision is improved, but measurement time and resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponsiveness assessment accuracyVSAvoiddiagnostic time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the extraction principle by identifying and measuring only the most clinically relevant marker genes (such as CD40, BCL6, IGF1R, and select additional markers) rather than performing comprehensive genomic analysis. This selective extraction of key biomarkers maintains high prediction accuracy for treatment responsiveness while significantly reducing measurement time, computational resources, and diagnostic complexity compared to analyzing all possible genetic markers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9617600B2Methods for assessing responsiveness of B-cell lymphoma to treatment with anti-CD40 antibodies
Publication Date: 2017.04.11 GENENTECH INC
  • US9617600B2 patent drawing
  • US9617600B2 patent drawing
  • US9617600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides methods and kits useful for predicting or assessing responsiveness of a patient having B-cell lymphoma to treatment with anti-CD40 antibodies.