TRP-Specific Beam Failure Recovery in 5G M-TRP Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current 5G communication systems face challenges in accurately detecting and recovering from beam failures in Multiple Transmission and Reception Points (M-TRP) scenarios, particularly in distinguishing which TRP a failed beam corresponds to and selecting an optimized replacement beam, leading to suboptimal data throughput.

Innovation Solution

The method involves receiving reference signals from multiple TRPs, determining beam failure instances, and implementing a TRP-specific beam failure recovery process by updating counters and performing recovery procedures based on signal power thresholds and timing windows, allowing for per-TRP beam failure detection and recovery.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If beam failure detection is performed in M-TRP scenarios using conventional methods, then the system can detect beam failures, but it cannot accurately distinguish which TRP the failed beam corresponds to, leading to suboptimal recovery

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam failure detection accuracyVSAvoidTRP identification information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the beam failure detection process by TRP, maintaining separate BFI counters (e.g., BFI counter 402 for first TRP, BFI counter 404 for second TRP) and separate timing windows for each TRP. This segmentation enables independent tracking of beam failure instances for each TRP, allowing accurate identification of which specific TRP experienced the failure while maintaining overall system detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If a single beam failure counter is used for multiple TRPs, then the detection process is simpler, but the recovery process cannot be optimized for individual TRPs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata throughputVSAvoidcounter management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by configuring different parameters (counter thresholds, timing window durations) for each TRP based on their specific characteristics. For example, the first TRP may have a BFI counter threshold of 3 with a 10ms timing window, while the second TRP has a threshold of 5 with a 15ms window. This allows each TRP to be optimized independently for maximum data throughput while the overall system complexity remains manageable through standardized management procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If beam failure recovery is performed without TRP-specific tracking, then the recovery process is faster, but network scheduling may depend on failed TRPs reducing overall efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling reliabilityVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring TRP-specific parameters including BFI counter thresholds, timing window durations, and replacement beam configurations for each TRP before beam failures occur. This preparation enables immediate TRP-specific recovery actions when failures are detected, ensuring scheduling reliability is maintained while minimizing recovery time through pre-planned recovery procedures for each TRP.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240244699A1Method and device for multiple transmission and reception points beam failure recovery
Publication Date: 2024.07.18 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO LTD
  • US20240244699A1 patent drawing
  • US20240244699A1 patent drawing
  • US20240244699A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of implementing beam failure recovery for a multi-transmission-and-reception-point (M-TRP) transmission including a first transmission from a first TRP and a second transmission from a second TRP may include: receiving a first set of reference signals (RSs) corresponding to the first TRP and a second set of RSs corresponding to the second TRP; determining that the first set of RSs indicates a beam failure instance (BFI) specific to the first TRP, and responsively updating a first BFI counter specific to the first TRP; determining that a beam failure with respect to the first TRP has occurred based on a count of the first BFI counter equaling or surpassing a first BFI counter threshold; and performing a BFR process for the first TRP responsive to determining that the beam failure with respect to the first TRP has occurred.