Automated AI Model Re-Learning in M2M Systems

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine-to-machine (M2M) systems lack effective mechanisms for automated re-learning of artificial intelligence (AI) models, which is essential for maintaining accuracy and adaptability in dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus for generating resources for training AI models, performing initial learning, collecting learning data, and triggering re-learning based on predefined criteria, utilizing a transceiver and processor to manage the AI model's training and re-training processes within the M2M system.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If AI models are trained initially and then used in M2M systems, then the system can operate with pre-existing knowledge, but the model cannot adapt to dynamic environmental changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel adaptabilityVSAvoidre-learning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and storing learning data during normal operation, so that when re-learning is needed, the data is already prepared and can be used immediately. This reduces the time loss associated with re-learning by having the necessary resources ready in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where learning data is continuously collected from system operation and used to update the AI model. This feedback loop enables the model to adapt to dynamic environmental changes while the collected data serves as the foundation for efficient re-learning without time loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Extent of automation

If re-learning is performed manually, then control and monitoring are easier, but automation capability and system efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvere-learning automationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically collecting learning data during operation and initiating re-learning processes without manual intervention. The system monitors its own performance, gathers necessary data, and executes re-learning autonomously, thereby increasing automation while managing complexity through integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple functions including data collection, performance monitoring, and model re-learning into a unified automated process. By combining these functions that would otherwise be separate manual tasks into an integrated system, automation is achieved without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If learning data is collected continuously, then model accuracy is maintained, but data storage and processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by selectively collecting and storing only the learning data that is relevant and useful for model improvement. Rather than treating all data uniformly, the system identifies and retains data with specific qualities that contribute to accuracy, reducing unnecessary data volume while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system discards redundant or less useful learning data while recovering and retaining only the essential data needed for model re-learning. This selective approach maintains prediction accuracy by preserving valuable learning patterns while reducing the overall data volume that requires storage and processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20230153626A1Method and apparatus for supporting automated re-learning in machine to machine system
Publication Date: 2023.05.18 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20230153626A1 patent drawing
  • US20230153626A1 patent drawing
  • US20230153626A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure may support automated re-learning in a machine-to-machine (M2M) system. A method for operating a device may include: generating a resource for training an artificial intelligence (AI) model; controlling to perform initial learning of the AI model; collecting learning data for re-learning for the AI model; and controlling to perform re-learning of the AI model by using the learning data.