Macroscopic Maceral Separation via Segmented Coal Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods such as iso-density gradient separation and electro-flotation have failed to effectively macroscopically separate coal macerals, hindering the comprehensive and efficient utilization of coal.

Innovation Solution

A process involving crushing and sieving raw coal into specific particle size ranges, followed by heavy medium cyclone (HMC) separation and froth flotation, using agents like 2-octanol and kerosene, to obtain vitrinite and inertinite concentrates, optimizing particle size ranges and separation densities for efficient maceral separation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If iso-density gradient separation or electro-flotation is used, then coal macerals can be separated, but the separation is not effective at macroscopic level

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemacroscopic separation effectivenessVSAvoidseparation method capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the coal processing into distinct size fractions through crushing and sieving, separating coal into different particle size ranges. Each fraction is then processed through appropriate separation methods (HMC for larger particles, froth flotation for finer particles), enabling effective macroscopic separation of macerals that cannot be achieved by single-method approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes key parameters including particle size distribution (through controlled crushing and sieving), heavy medium density (adjusted for HMC separation), and flotation reagent dosages. These parameter optimizations enable the separation process to achieve macroscopic maceral separation effectiveness that overcomes the limitations of conventional methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If heavy medium cyclone separation is applied to all particle sizes, then separation can be performed, but fine particles cannot be effectively separated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefine particle separation effectivenessVSAvoidseparation method applicability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments particles by size before separation, directing fine particles (<0.5mm) to froth flotation and coarser particles to HMC separation. This segmentation allows each separation method to operate in its optimal particle size range, achieving effective fine particle separation while maintaining overall process versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces size-based classification as an intermediary step between crushing and separation. This intermediary classification process sorts particles into appropriate size fractions, enabling the subsequent separation methods to handle particles within their effective ranges and achieve overall macroscopic maceral separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If froth flotation is used for all particle sizes, then separation can be performed, but larger particles are not effectively separated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelarge particle separation effectivenessVSAvoidseparation method适用范围
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the coal feed into different particle size fractions, directing larger particles (>0.5mm) to HMC separation where they can be effectively separated based on density differences. This segmentation enables large particle separation effectiveness while maintaining process versatility through multi-method processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the separation approach based on particle size parameters, using HMC with optimized heavy medium density for larger particles and froth flotation with optimized reagent dosages for finer particles. This parameter-based adaptation achieves effective large particle separation while maintaining overall process versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If coal is not crushed to specific particle size ranges, then processing is simpler, but separation effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaceral separation effectivenessVSAvoidcrushing and sieving process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary crushing and sieving to achieve specific particle size distributions before separation. This preliminary size classification action enables subsequent separation methods to work effectively on appropriately sized particles, achieving macroscopic maceral separation effectiveness despite the added processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes particle size parameters through controlled crushing and sieving, creating specific size distributions that maximize separation effectiveness. This parameter optimization justifies the additional processing complexity by enabling effective macroscopic separation that cannot be achieved with unprocessed coal.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This process enables the macroscopic separation of maceral concentrates, enhancing the hierarchical classification and utilization of coal, improving the economic efficiency and stability of coal processing by determining optimal particle size ranges and separation densities for HMC and froth flotation.

Implementation Method 1

subjecting the first coal sample to a heavy medium cyclone (HMC) separation process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeavy medium cyclone separation: Centrifugal Separation

Implementation Method 2

HMC separation process includes a concentration separation stage and a fine separation stage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDensity-based separation: Density Gradient

Implementation Method 3

subjecting the second coal sample to a froth flotation process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFroth flotation: Froth Floatation

Implementation Method 4

The froth flotation process uses a froth flotation agent including a foaming agent and a collector

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSurface tension-based separation: Surface Tension

Data Source

PatentUS10906048B1Process for macroscopically separating maceral concentrate from raw coal
Publication Date: 2021.02.02 TAIYUAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY
  • US10906048B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Processes for macroscopically separating a maceral concentrate from raw coal are disclosed. In some embodiments, a process includes the following steps: crushing and sieving the raw coal to obtain a first coal sample and a second coal sample; subjecting the first coal sample to a heavy medium cyclone separation process; and subjecting the second coal sample to a froth flotation process. The first coal sample has a particle size within a first particle size range, and the second coal sample has a particle size within a second particle size range. In other embodiments, the froth flotation process uses a froth flotation agent including a foaming agent and a collector. The foaming agent includes at least one item selected from the group consisting of 2-octanol, terpenic oil, and polyethylene glycol (PEG). The collector includes at least one item selected from the group consisting of kerosene, diethyl phthalate (BET), and diesel.