Machine Multifactor Authentication via Parallel Channel Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current multifactor authentication systems for machines are vulnerable to fraud due to sequential verification of factors, which can be exploited by bad actors, and existing hardware-based authentication methods are easily replicated.

Innovation Solution

Simultaneous reception and verification of multiple authentication factors for machines using advanced cellular networks, such as 6G, through parallel channels, combined with a security scoring model to evaluate the authenticity of these factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If sequential verification of authentication factors is used, then verification completeness is improved, but authentication time increases and fraud vulnerability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification completenessVSAvoidauthentication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system segments the verification process by receiving multiple authentication factors through different communication channels simultaneously, then processes and verifies each factor in parallel rather than sequentially. This segmentation allows the system to maintain complete verification while reducing total authentication time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the verification process by implementing parallel processing of authentication factors based on their security weights. The authentication server can adaptively select which factors to verify in parallel versus sequentially based on real-time security requirements and system load, optimizing both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If sequential verification of authentication factors is used, then verification completeness is improved, but fraud vulnerability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification completenessVSAvoidfraud vulnerability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments authentication factors across multiple independent communication channels, making it difficult for attackers to compromise all factors simultaneously. By receiving factors through diverse channels (e.g., hardware token, mobile device, biometric sensor), the system reduces fraud vulnerability while maintaining complete verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication server acts as an intermediary that coordinates parallel verification of multiple factors. It receives factors through different channels, assigns security weights to each factor, and synthesizes the results to make authentication decisions, thereby reducing vulnerability to fraud while maintaining verification completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If hardware-based challenge authentication is used, then authentication security is improved, but ease of replication increases for bad actors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidease of replication
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system uses a composite approach by combining multiple authentication factors with different security characteristics. Hardware-based challenges are combined with software-based factors, biometric data, and location information, creating a multi-layered authentication system that is secure yet difficult to replicate completely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes authentication parameters by adjusting which factors are required and their security weights based on the authentication context. This makes replication difficult because attackers would need to compromise multiple different types of factors rather than a single static authentication mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Productivity

If multiple authentication factors are verified in parallel, then authentication speed is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication server implements a universal verification framework that can handle multiple types of authentication factors (hardware tokens, biometric data, location information, device identifiers) through a single parallel processing architecture. This multi-functional approach enables fast authentication while managing system complexity through standardized processing routines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where the authentication server receives factors in parallel, verifies each against security thresholds, and provides immediate authentication decisions. The security scoring model provides feedback on factor validity, allowing the system to maintain high speed while managing complexity through automated decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12563033B2Systems and methods for simultaneous machine multifactor authentication
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12563033B2 patent drawing
  • US12563033B2 patent drawing
  • US12563033B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for simultaneous machine multifactor authentication. An example method includes simultaneously receiving, by communications hardware and in response to a machine authentication request, a plurality of authentication factors for a machine via a plurality of channels, wherein the plurality of authentication factors comprises at least one hardware-based challenge authentication factor. The example method further includes verifying, by an authentication engine, the plurality of authentication factors in parallel and authorizing, by the authentication engine, one or more actions based on a successful verification of the plurality of authentication factors.