Machine Collision Recovery Using Swept-Volume Trajectories

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual recovery of machines after collisions is time-consuming and risky, especially for machines with complex kinematics or in cluttered environments, leading to prolonged downtime and potential damage.

Innovation Solution

An automated method and system for machine recovery that records configurations and calculates a recovery sequence based on swept volumes, allowing machines to return to a safe position without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual recovery process is used for machines with complex kinematics or in cluttered environments, then operator safety is maintained, but recovery time increases significantly and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator safetyVSAvoidrecovery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates multiple recovery trajectories before a collision occurs, storing them for immediate use. When a collision is detected, the pre-computed trajectories are instantly available, eliminating the need for real-time path planning during recovery and significantly reducing recovery time while maintaining safety through pre-validated paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates virtual copies of the machine's swept volume and uses these digital models to simulate and evaluate recovery paths. By working with virtual representations rather than physical manipulation, the system can rapidly assess multiple trajectories without risking actual collisions, enabling fast automated recovery decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Productivity

If automated recovery is implemented, then recovery time decreases and productivity increases, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecovery speedVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system pre-computes and stores multiple recovery trajectories during the machine setup phase, organizing them by target positions and collision scenarios. This preliminary preparation creates a lookup table of valid recovery paths that the automated system can quickly select and execute, reducing real-time computational requirements and controlling system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the recorded configuration data and swept volume information to automatically generate and evaluate recovery trajectories without external intervention. The machine's own operational data serves as the basis for its recovery planning, eliminating the need for complex external control systems while enabling fast automated recovery

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If comprehensive swept volume calculations are performed to ensure safe recovery paths, then collision avoidance during recovery is improved, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system calculates and stores the machine's swept volume during normal operation and before collision detection. By having this spatial information pre-computed and stored, the recovery trajectory evaluation can quickly check against pre-existing volume data rather than performing complex real-time calculations, reducing computational energy while maintaining accurate collision avoidance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system evaluates multiple recovery trajectories using the recorded configurations and swept volume data, selecting the most appropriate path without exhaustively analyzing every possible trajectory. This partial evaluation approach provides sufficient collision avoidance assurance while keeping computational requirements manageable for automated real-time operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250332726A1Automatic collision recovery for machines
Publication Date: 2025.10.30 SIEMENS AG
  • US20250332726A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332726A1 patent drawing
  • US20250332726A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for automatic recovery of a machine after a collision event occurred within a workspace environment of the machine is provided. The method may include recording a plurality of configurations of a machine during execution of a task; calculating based on the plurality of recorded configurations, a swept volume occupied by the machine during execution of the task; in response to a collision event, determining, based on the swept volume, a recovery sequence of movements for the machine; and using the recovery sequence of movements to lead the machine back to a predefined known safe position after the collision event occurred.