Production Line Machine Configuration Using Latent Performance Metrics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine configuration settings in production lines are often adjusted based on intuition rather than data-driven analysis, failing to consider the overall process performance and latent characteristics, leading to suboptimal outcomes.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a data-driven approach using machine learning algorithms to analyze current, historical, and latent metrics to determine counter-intuitive configuration settings for individual machines, optimizing overall process performance by considering the impact on the entire production line.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If configuration settings are optimized for individual machine performance, then that machine's efficiency is improved, but the impact on other machines and overall process performance is neglected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual machine efficiencyVSAvoidoverall process performance consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the configuration optimization of multiple machines into a unified process. The analysis service considers performance data from multiple machines and latent feedback simultaneously, generating configuration recommendations that optimize the entire production line rather than individual machines in isolation, thereby maintaining overall process consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The configuration analysis service performs multiple functions: it analyzes individual machine performance, evaluates overall production line performance, incorporates latent feedback, and generates configuration recommendations that consider the entire system. This multi-functional approach ensures that individual optimizations do not compromise overall process reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If traditional configuration methods are used without analyzing latent metrics, then implementation is simple, but valuable performance insights and optimization opportunities are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration method simplicityVSAvoidlatent performance characteristics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of latent metrics and performance data before making configuration changes. The analysis service pre-processes and analyzes various data sources including latent feedback, then generates configuration recommendations based on this preliminary analysis, ensuring that valuable performance insights are captured before implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary analysis service that bridges the gap between simple configuration methods and complex latent metric analysis. This intermediary layer collects and analyzes latent metrics, then translates the insights into actionable configuration recommendations, making the complex analysis transparent and manageable while capturing valuable performance information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12422792B1Individual machine configuration based on overall process performance and latent metrics
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12422792B1 patent drawing
  • US12422792B1 patent drawing
  • US12422792B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine-level metrics for machines of a processing line, as well as latent metrics for results of the processing line, are obtained for the current time period. Machine configuration setting values for the machines during the current time period, as well as at the earlier time period are also obtained. Updates to current configuration setting values of the machines are determined based upon analysis of the machine-level metrics, the process-level metrics for the current time period, the latent metrics for the earlier time period, and the machine configuration setting values for the current and earlier time periods (e.g., the metrics and configuration values may be input to one or more machine learning models used to determine the updates to current configuration setting values for the individual machines). The current values may be changed to the updated values via an automated process or the updates presented as a recommendation report.