Machine Failure Prediction Using Unsupervised Sensor Pattern Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine monitoring systems fail to accurately predict failures due to reliance on predetermined rules, neglecting collected data, requiring specialized operators, and leading to unnecessary maintenance and downtime, while current solutions often miss or inaccurately determine failures.

Innovation Solution

An unsupervised machine learning approach that analyzes sensory inputs from machines to identify patterns and predict future failures, using preprocessing and unsupervised machine learning models to select optimal methods for detecting anomalies and generating adaptive thresholds.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If predetermined rules are used for monitoring machine failures, then the monitoring system can identify failures quickly, but it only checks particular key parameters while ignoring the rest of the collected data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidunused collected data
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and analyzes specific features from the collected sensory data that are most relevant to failure prediction, rather than using all raw data or ignoring data entirely. The system identifies and focuses on critical parameters that indicate potential failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw sensory data into meaningful features by changing parameters through signal processing and feature extraction techniques. This allows the system to convert large volumes of raw data into compact, informative representations that capture failure indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Loss of time

If periodic testing at predetermined intervals is used, then maintenance can be scheduled in advance, but it results in wasted materials and expenses replacing parts that are still functioning properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanned maintenance timingVSAvoidwasted replacement parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sensory data to predict future failures before they actually occur. By detecting early signs of degradation and predicting when failure will happen, the system enables maintenance to be scheduled just in time, avoiding both premature replacement and unexpected failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors sensory data and provides feedback about the actual condition and degradation trends of machine components. This feedback loop allows dynamic adjustment of maintenance timing based on real-time condition assessment rather than fixed schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If existing monitoring systems are used to identify failures, then failures can be detected after or immediately before downtime begins, but they cannot predict failures in advance to prevent downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection capabilityVSAvoidmachine downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of failure indicators by analyzing sensory data for early signs of degradation. It predicts future failures before they occur, enabling preventive maintenance that avoids downtime entirely rather than just detecting failures after they happen.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical monitoring approaches with data-driven predictive analytics. By using machine learning algorithms to analyze sensory data patterns, the system substitutes conventional reactive monitoring with proactive failure prediction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If dedicated testing equipment and specialized operators are required, then accurate failure detection can be achieved, but the system becomes inconvenient and costly with potential human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure detection accuracyVSAvoidtesting equipment requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses standard sensory equipment already present on modern machines (temperature sensors, vibration sensors, current sensors) rather than requiring dedicated specialized testing equipment. The same sensors serve multiple functions including operation monitoring and failure prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs automated analysis of sensory data using machine learning algorithms, eliminating the need for specialized operators to interpret results. The system self-diagnoses potential failures by automatically detecting patterns in the sensory data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12524293B2System and method for unsupervised prediction of machine failures
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US12524293B2 patent drawing
  • US12524293B2 patent drawing
  • US12524293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for unsupervised prediction of machine failures. The method includes monitoring sensory inputs related to at least one machine; analyzing, via at least unsupervised machine learning, the monitored sensory inputs, wherein the output of the unsupervised machine learning includes at least one indicator; identifying, based on the at least one indicator, at least one pattern; and determining, based on the at least one pattern and the monitored sensory inputs, at least one machine failure prediction.