Unsupervised Machine Failure Prediction From Sensor Patterns

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing monitoring systems for machine failures in industrial settings are inefficient, often identifying issues only after downtime begins, relying on predetermined rules that ignore relevant data, leading to wasted resources and premature maintenance, and requiring specialized operators, which can result in missed or inaccurate failure determinations and significant lost revenue.

Innovation Solution

An unsupervised machine learning-based method and system that monitors sensory inputs from machines to predict failures by analyzing patterns in real-time data, using meta-models and adaptive thresholds to detect anomalies and generate notifications for potential failures, thereby reducing downtime and resource waste.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If existing monitoring systems use predetermined rules for failure detection, then the system structure is simple and easy to implement, but the measurement precision and reliability of failure detection deteriorate because relevant data is ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system structureVSAvoidfailure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical rule-based monitoring systems with an unsupervised machine learning system that automatically learns patterns from sensor data. The system uses algorithms to detect anomalies and predict failures without relying on predetermined human-defined rules, thereby improving detection accuracy while maintaining computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts monitoring parameters and thresholds based on learned patterns from historical data rather than using fixed predetermined values. This allows the system to adapt to changing machine conditions and improve failure detection precision by optimizing parameters in real-time based on actual operational data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If existing systems rely on periodic testing at predetermined intervals, then the ease of operation is improved, but the loss of time increases due to premature maintenance and wasted resources

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance schedulingVSAvoiddowntime and resource waste
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary failure prediction by continuously analyzing sensor data and identifying patterns that precede failures. By detecting early signs of deterioration, the system enables maintenance to be scheduled just before actual failure occurs, avoiding both premature maintenance and unexpected downtime, thereby optimizing the timing of maintenance actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The unsupervised machine learning system automatically monitors machine conditions and predicts failures without requiring constant human intervention or predetermined maintenance schedules. The system self-adjusts its monitoring strategy based on learned patterns, reducing operational complexity while minimizing unnecessary maintenance activities and resource waste.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If existing monitoring systems require specialized operators for testing equipment, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of failure determination deteriorates due to human error and inability to analyze large data volumes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator training requirementsVSAvoidfailure determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human operators with an automated unsupervised machine learning system that processes sensor data. This eliminates human error and the limitations of human analytical capacity while handling large volumes of data, thereby improving reliability without requiring specialized training or intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an automated algorithmic intermediary between the sensor data and failure determination, replacing the human operator role. This intermediary continuously analyzes data patterns and provides objective, consistent failure predictions without being subject to human limitations, thereby enhancing reliability while simplifying operational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Use of energy by moving object

If existing solutions use predetermined rules that check only particular key parameters, then the use of computing resources is reduced, but the measurement precision deteriorates because not all collected data is utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing resource consumptionVSAvoidfailure detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces selective parameter checking with comprehensive unsupervised machine learning analysis that processes all available sensor data. The algorithms automatically identify relevant patterns and features from the complete dataset, improving detection accuracy without requiring disproportionate computing resources through efficient data processing techniques.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11138056B2System and method for unsupervised prediction of machine failures
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US11138056B2 patent drawing
  • US11138056B2 patent drawing
  • US11138056B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for unsupervised prediction of machine failures. The method includes monitoring sensory inputs related to at least one machine; analyzing, via at least unsupervised machine learning, the monitored sensory inputs, wherein the output of the unsupervised machine learning includes at least one indicator; identifying, based on the at least one indicator, at least one pattern; and determining, based on the at least one pattern and the monitored sensory inputs, at least one machine failure prediction.