Machine Impact Monitoring for Remaining Life Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems face challenges in accurately predicting the remaining useful life (RUL) of industrial machines due to sensor limitations, calibration intricacies, and the need for synchronized data across diverse operational conditions, particularly neglecting swing and drop impacts which can cause significant structural damage.

Innovation Solution

A system that integrates sensors to collect impact data, processes it to assign damage values, and generates recommendations for maintenance using a RUL model to estimate machine life, accounting for swing and drop impacts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If real-time sensor data is integrated into RUL calculations, then prediction accuracy is improved, but data quality and reliability challenges worsen due to sensor limitations and calibration intricacies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiddata quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces simulation data as an intermediary between sensor data and RUL calculations. The system generates simulated sensor data that mirrors real sensor characteristics and correlates it with known degradation patterns from physics-based models. This simulation layer mediates the relationship between imperfect real sensor data and RUL predictions, allowing the system to achieve accurate predictions while accounting for sensor limitations and calibration issues through the simulated reference framework

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts sensor parameters and calibration factors based on simulated reference data. By comparing real sensor readings with simulated equivalents under known conditions, the system automatically calibrates sensor parameters, compensates for drift, and adapts to changing sensor characteristics over time, thereby maintaining data quality and reliability despite sensor limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If sufficient operational data is accumulated to capture diverse usage patterns, then RUL determination accuracy is improved, but sampling time delay worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRUL determination accuracyVSAvoidsampling time delay
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-generating simulation data covering a wide range of operational conditions, usage patterns, and degradation scenarios before they occur in real operation. This pre-computed simulation database allows the system to immediately match real sensor data against relevant simulated scenarios without needing to accumulate extensive real-world data, thereby reducing sampling time delay while maintaining accurate RUL determination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of operational data through simulation. Instead of waiting to collect diverse real operational data over long periods, the system generates synthetic copies of sensor data that represent various usage patterns and environmental conditions. These simulated data copies can be immediately used for RUL prediction, eliminating the time delay associated with accumulating sufficient real operational data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If sophisticated modeling techniques are used to capture degradation processes, then prediction accuracy is improved, but system complexity worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidmodeling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The simulation environment serves as an intermediary that encapsulates sophisticated physics-based degradation models. Rather than directly implementing complex degradation models in the prediction system, the patent uses simulation to pre-compute degradation patterns under various conditions. This intermediary simulation layer handles the modeling complexity internally, allowing the actual RUL prediction system to use simpler comparison and matching algorithms while still achieving high accuracy through the simulated reference data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Reliability

If synchronization between real-world data and simulated environments is ensured, then correlation reliability is improved, but technical challenge worsens due to synchronization requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorrelation reliabilityVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces direct mechanical/temporal synchronization mechanisms with a data-driven correlation approach. Instead of requiring precise temporal alignment between real and simulated data streams through complex synchronization hardware and protocols, the patent uses simulation data that is inherently correlated with real operational patterns through physics-based models. The system matches real sensor data against simulated scenarios based on operational conditions rather than strict timing, substituting complex synchronization requirements with more manageable data correlation techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20250297464A1Systems and methods for predicting a condition of a machine
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US20250297464A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297464A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297464A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for predicting the conditions of one or more components of a machine are disclosed. The method includes receiving impact data from one or more sensors associated with the machine. The method includes processing the impact data to assign damage values to one or more components of the machine. The method includes generating one or more recommendations or machine life estimations based on the damage values in a user interface of the machine.