Machine Learning Anomaly Engine for Real-Time Prescriptive Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anomaly detection systems lack the ability to perform real-time, on-demand anomaly detection and fail to convert anomaly detection into a persistent process, unable to detect previously unknown anomalies and provide prescriptive actions tailored to user responsibility and security levels.

Innovation Solution

A real-time trainable anomaly detection engine using machine learning models, such as autoencoders, that analyze data from multiple locations, generate instructions for anomaly identification, and transmit results to user devices or external systems, enabling continuous monitoring and responsive actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If real-time machine learning-based anomaly detection is implemented, then anomaly detection speed and real-time responsiveness are improved, but system complexity and computational resource requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the anomaly detection process into distinct modules: data collection module, machine learning model module, anomaly detection module, and prescriptive action module. This allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining real-time performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model is pre-trained on historical data before deployment. This preliminary training enables the model to make real-time predictions without requiring complex computations during actual anomaly detection, thus reducing real-time computational requirements while maintaining high detection speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If real-time anomaly detection with prescriptive actions is implemented, then anomaly detection accuracy and responsiveness are improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback loop where anomaly detection results and prescriptive actions are fed back into the machine learning model for continuous refinement. This feedback mechanism improves detection accuracy over time while the model learns to make faster predictions, reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts detection parameters and model thresholds based on real-time data characteristics and anomaly patterns. This adaptive parameter adjustment optimizes the balance between detection accuracy and processing speed, preventing excessive computational resources from being consumed on rare or insignificant anomalies

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If persistent anomaly monitoring with prescriptive actions is implemented, then system reliability and anomaly detection completeness are improved, but operational complexity and maintenance requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection completenessVSAvoidoperational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-monitoring and self-adjustment by automatically detecting anomalies in its own operation, generating prescriptive actions for maintenance, and updating its machine learning model without human intervention. This self-service capability improves detection completeness while reducing operational complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically discards false positive anomalies and recovers from false negatives by learning from correction feedback. This mechanism maintains high reliability by continuously improving detection accuracy while keeping the operational process simple through automated error correction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

Data Source

PatentUS20250299022A1Machine Learning Systems and Methods for Real Time Anomaly Detection and Prescriptive Feedback
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 ZEBRA TECHNOLOGIES CORP
  • US20250299022A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299022A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299022A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for anomaly detection comprising receiving a set of data parameters; retrieving a dataset corresponding to the set of data parameters from a database; analyzing, using a machine learning model trained in real-time, the dataset to detect one or more anomalies in the dataset; selecting a set of anomaly parameters corresponding to the detected one or more anomalies; filtering an output of the machine learning model according to the set of anomaly parameters; generating a set of instructions for identifying one or more anomalous items based on the set of data parameters, the set of anomaly parameters, and a set of detection pattern parameters; executing the set of instructions for identifying anomalous items to identify one or more anomalous items in real-time within the dataset responsive to updates to the dataset; and transmitting information about the one or more anomalous items to a user device or computing device.