Machine-Learning Cloud Code Compliance Checks Before Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Cloud infrastructure may suffer from security vulnerabilities due to non-compliance with requirements, leading to downtime and increased latency for users.

Innovation Solution

An automated system using machine learning to assess cloud infrastructure code for compliance, determining compliance indicators and severity levels, and selectively deploying the infrastructure based on these levels to ensure security and reduce downtime.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If cloud infrastructure is deployed without compliance assessment, then deployment speed is improved, but security vulnerabilities increase leading to downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidsecurity compliance
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs compliance assessment before deployment by analyzing infrastructure-as-code files against security policies. The machine learning model evaluates code patterns, configurations, and resource definitions in advance, identifying security issues before they reach production environments. This preliminary security check prevents non-compliant deployments while maintaining efficient release cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary compliance assessment system between code submission and deployment execution. This intermediate layer includes a machine learning model that acts as a mediator, analyzing infrastructure code and providing compliance feedback without blocking the deployment pipeline. The system integrates seamlessly into existing CI/CD workflows, allowing developers to proceed with deployment while security validation occurs in parallel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If traditional manual compliance checking is used, then security assessment thoroughness is improved, but time consumption and latency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompliance assessment accuracyVSAvoidassessment time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual compliance checking with an automated machine learning-based system. Instead of relying on human reviewers to manually examine infrastructure code for security issues, the system uses trained models to automatically analyze code patterns, configurations, and resource definitions. This substitution maintains thorough assessment capability while reducing time consumption from hours or days to minutes or seconds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model evaluates multiple compliance parameters simultaneously, including security policies, best practices, and organizational standards. By changing the assessment from a sequential manual process to a parallel automated evaluation of multiple parameters, the system achieves comprehensive coverage without increasing time consumption. The model can adjust assessment depth based on risk levels, allocating more resources to critical security checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive security checks are performed on all infrastructure code, then security coverage is improved, but system complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The compliance assessment system applies different levels of scrutiny to different parts of infrastructure code based on their security criticality. High-risk resources such as security groups, encryption keys, and access policies receive more intensive validation, while lower-risk components undergo lighter checks. This localized quality approach ensures comprehensive security coverage without uniformly increasing complexity across the entire assessment system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the compliance assessment process into modular components that can be independently configured and executed. The machine learning model is divided into specialized sub-models for different infrastructure types (compute, storage, networking, security). This segmentation allows the system to scale complexity only where needed, maintaining manageable system architecture while achieving broad security coverage across diverse infrastructure resources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12464008B2Automatic compliance assessment of cloud infrastructure code
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US12464008B2 patent drawing
  • US12464008B2 patent drawing
  • US12464008B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some implementations, a compliance system may receive, from a pipeline system, a set of properties associated with configuration of a cloud infrastructure. Additionally, the compliance system may receive, from a code repository, a set of computer code associated with the cloud infrastructure. The compliance system may provide the set of properties and the set of computer code to a machine learning model to receive a set of compliance indicators and a set of severity levels. Each compliance indicator in the set of compliance indicators being associated with a corresponding severity level in the set of severity levels. The compliance system may selectively deploy the cloud infrastructure in response to receiving the set of severity levels.