Machine-Learning Optical Lens Calibration for Depth-of-Field Precision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for determining the depth of field in optical lens systems are time-consuming and prone to inaccuracies, often requiring manual adjustments and limited to predetermined aperture settings, lacking automation and precision in focus and aperture mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

A computer-controlled system that automatically adjusts focus and aperture settings using a machine learning model to optimize decode performance by iteratively capturing images of a target with varying settings, storing associations in a database, and selecting optimal settings based on decode performance metrics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual adjustment methods are used for determining depth of field, then the process can be performed with simple equipment, but the determination is time-consuming and prone to inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedepth of field determination accuracyVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment of focus and aperture with an automated computer-controlled system. The computer automatically adjusts the focus mechanism and aperture mechanism while capturing images at multiple settings, eliminating manual intervention and significantly reducing calibration time while improving measurement precision through systematic automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-calibration by automatically determining optimal focus and aperture settings without requiring manual operation. The computer-controlled system independently adjusts parameters, captures images, analyzes results, and determines depth of field measurements autonomously, making the calibration process self-service oriented.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated computer-controlled adjustment is implemented, then calibration speed and precision improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The computer-controlled system serves multiple functions: it controls the focus mechanism, controls the aperture mechanism, captures images, stores image data, and performs analysis to determine depth of field. By consolidating these multiple functions into a single integrated system, the patent achieves high productivity while managing device complexity through multi-functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If iterative image capturing with varying settings is performed, then optimal settings are identified through learning, but the number of image captures and processing steps increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecode performance accuracyVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by capturing images at multiple focus and aperture settings, analyzing the decode performance of each captured image, and using this analysis to determine optimal settings. The computer processes the series of images, compares performance metrics, and identifies the settings that yield the best decode performance, creating a closed-loop feedback system that improves measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12425721B1Optical lens characterization and calibration
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12425721B1 patent drawing
  • US12425721B1 patent drawing
  • US12425721B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for optical lens characterization and calibration are described herein. In an example, a computer system receives a first image of a target captured by an image acquisition system having a camera and a lens and using first setting values in a setting space. The computer system inputs the first setting values and a first decode performance associated with image acquisition system having the first setting values for the barcode sets in the first image into a machine learning model and determines a representation of the setting space. The computer system inputs the machine learning model and one or more conditions into an algorithm and receives an output indicating second setting values in the setting space for the image acquisition system. The computer system sends the second setting values to the controller, which is configured to set the settings for the image acquisition system based on the second setting values.