Machine-Learning Networking GUI with Explainable Interaction Recommendations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Individuals often miss potential interaction opportunities due to a lack of awareness or inability to efficiently assess relevant information, leading to unproductive or unprofitable interactions.

Innovation Solution

A graphical user interface (GUI) facilitated by machine learning models that provides data-driven interaction recommendations, including selectable communication affordances to generate data structures for initiating interactions, with user feedback loop for model improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If machine learning models and data processing are used to provide interaction recommendations, then the quality and relevance of interaction opportunities are improved, but the system complexity and computational resources required are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of interaction recommendationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex recommendation task into multiple specialized machine learning models: supervised learning models for data classification, unsupervised learning models for pattern discovery, and large language models for generating interaction recommendations. Each model handles a specific aspect of the recommendation process, improving overall precision while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of machine learning models that process raw entity data and transform it into structured recommendations. These models act as mediators between the raw data sources and the user interface, filtering and organizing information to provide high-quality recommendations without exposing the underlying system complexity to users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple machine learning models are used to process and analyze entity data, then the accuracy of interaction opportunity identification is improved, but the time and computational resources required are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of interaction identificationVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data processing and classification using supervised and unsupervised learning models before generating final recommendations. By pre-processing and organizing entity data in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during recommendation generation, maintaining high accuracy while reducing real-time processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs a multi-model approach where different machine learning models process different aspects of the data. Rather than using a single comprehensive model that would require excessive computational resources, the system applies multiple specialized models selectively, achieving high accuracy through targeted analysis of relevant features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Ease of operation

If the system provides detailed explanations and multiple communication affordances for each recommendation, then the user's ability to initiate effective interactions is improved, but the information overload and user interface complexity are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of interaction initiationVSAvoidinformation overload
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides different levels of detail and different types of communication affordances tailored to each specific recommendation and user context. Rather than providing uniform detailed information for all recommendations, the interface adapts the level of explanation and the types of communication options based on the specific interaction opportunity, reducing information overload while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Adaptability or versatility

If real-time feedback collection and model updating are implemented, then the adaptability and continuous improvement of recommendations are improved, but the system maintenance complexity and computational overhead are increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability of recommendationsVSAvoidsystem maintenance complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where user interactions and outcomes are collected and used to retrain and improve the machine learning models. This continuous feedback mechanism enables the system to adapt to changing user needs and improve recommendation quality over time, while the modular architecture helps manage the complexity of model maintenance and updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250232758A1Machine-learning-based networking graphical user interface
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 PWC PRODUCT SALES LLC
  • US20250232758A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232758A1 patent drawing
  • US20250232758A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for displaying a graphical user interface (GUI) for facilitating interactions with one or more entities may include receiving data associated with the one or more entities from one or more data sources, providing the data associated with the one or more entities to one or more machine learning models, receiving explainability data from the one or more machine learning models, wherein the explainability data indicates one or more recommendations for interacting with the one or more entities, and displaying the GUI for facilitating interactions with the one or more entities, wherein the GUI comprises one or more communication affordances generated using the explainability data, wherein a user selection of a communication affordance generates a communication data structure configured to facilitate a recommended interaction of the one or more recommended interactions via a communication medium.