Machine Learning URL Position Forecasting for Targeted SERP Growth

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing web properties often lack updated marketing strategies, leading to potential slumps in sales and profitability due to outdated or insufficient search engine optimization (SEO), despite initial recognition and success, which can be attributed to mismanagement, competition, and unawareness of offerings.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for predicting uniform resource locator (URL) positioning on search engine result pages (SERPs) using machine learning, involving URL classification, filtering, and optimization selection, to generate predictions for future SERP positions based on historical data and expected search volume, click-through rates, and conversion values.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If web properties rely on initial recognition and success, then they can achieve early growth, but they eventually experience slumps in production and profitability due to outdated SEO strategies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesales and profitabilityVSAvoidSEO strategy updates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis by predicting future SERP positions for multiple URLs before actual optimization occurs. It proactively identifies which URLs are likely to rank highest for target keywords and prepares optimization recommendations in advance, allowing web properties to stay ahead of search algorithm changes and maintain competitiveness without waiting for performance slumps to manifest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors actual SERP positions and compares them against predicted positions, creating a feedback loop that measures optimization effectiveness. This feedback mechanism enables iterative improvement by adjusting strategies based on actual performance data, ensuring SEO tactics remain effective as search algorithms evolve and preventing profitability slumps before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If web properties use traditional SEO methods, then they can maintain simple operations, but they fail to compete with updated marketing strategies and competition

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarketing strategy updatesVSAvoidsearch engine ranking consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates optimization recommendations and predicts SERP positions without requiring manual analysis of search algorithms or competitive landscapes. It self-updates its predictions by processing changes in search behavior, algorithm updates, and competitive actions, freeing operators from complex manual SEO management while maintaining reliable ranking predictions and optimization strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If web properties focus on branded URLs, then they can maintain existing traffic, but they miss opportunities to optimize non-branded URLs for additional growth

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewebsite traffic and projected revenueVSAvoidURL classification and filtering system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments URLs into distinct categories (branded vs. non-branded) and applies different optimization strategies to each segment. It separately analyzes and predicts performance for non-branded URLs, identifying optimization opportunities that would be overlooked in a unified approach. This segmentation enables targeted optimization of underperforming non-branded URLs to capture additional traffic and revenue streams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies localized optimization quality to different URL types, recognizing that non-branded URLs require different optimization tactics than branded URLs. It tailors specific optimization recommendations to the unique characteristics of each URL segment, such as focusing on keyword relevance and content quality for non-branded URLs while maintaining brand consistency for branded URLs, thereby maximizing overall traffic and revenue potential.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12353492B1Machine learning system and method for targeted growth projection of market inquiry results
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 TERAKEET LLC
  • US12353492B1 patent drawing
  • US12353492B1 patent drawing
  • US12353492B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a system and method for obtaining, according to current and historical URL placement(s) on search engine results pages (SERPs) for identified keywords, predicted URL performance in SERP positioning. Such performance can, using URL titles and snippets appearing on SERPS, be assessed for URLs filtered to meet targeted (i.e., non-branded, informational, transactional) classifications. When a machine learning model receives input, including, for example, (a) historical trajectories of SERP positions for filtered URLs matched for identified keywords, (b) URL classification as informational or transactional, and (c) URL work type categorization (e.g. optimization, new Content, or no action), positioning for an analyzed URL on one or more SERPs returned for query according to one or more identified keywords can be predicted for a predetermined time horizon.