Machine Learning Supply Chain Failure Prediction from Historical Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Supply chain planning systems often fail to account for variations in demand and production, leading to service level failures due to asynchronous data requirements and planning periods across different processes, making it difficult to generate globally-optimized plans and resulting in undesirable customer service level targets.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning techniques to predict supply chain failures using historical data, generate alerts, and provide contextual visualizations to identify underlying causes, allowing for proactive adjustments before failures occur, without real-time data integration with planning and execution processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If distinct and dissimilar processes (demand planning, production planning, supply planning, distribution planning) are used for supply chain planning, then each process can operate with its own data requirements and planning periods, but it becomes difficult to synchronize these processes and generate globally-optimized plans

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess flexibilityVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a machine learning model as an intermediary that receives data from multiple distinct planning processes (demand planning, production planning, supply planning, distribution planning) and generates predictions about service level failures. This intermediary synthesizes information from the dissimilar processes without requiring direct synchronization between them, enabling globally-optimized planning while maintaining process independence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by using the machine learning model to predict potential service level failures before they occur. By analyzing historical data and identifying risk patterns in advance, the system enables proactive adjustments to be made to the supply chain plan, preventing failures rather than reacting to them after synchronization issues arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If supply chain plans are generated without accounting for demand and production variations, then planning can be completed within standard timeframes, but service level failures occur and customer service level targets are not met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanning speedVSAvoidservice level achievement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning model performs preliminary analysis of historical supply chain data to identify patterns and risk factors associated with service level failures. This preliminary action enables the system to predict potential failures before finalizing the supply chain plan, allowing for proactive adjustments that maintain both planning speed and service level reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by using the machine learning model to continuously analyze outcomes and identify variations in demand and production that may lead to service level failures. This feedback mechanism enables the planning system to account for variations in future plans while maintaining efficient planning cycles, thereby improving both reliability and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If real-time data integration with planning and execution processes is implemented, then accurate predictions can be made, but implementation time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidimplementation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential predictive functionality from complex real-time data integration systems. By using a machine learning model trained on historical data, the system captures the core predictive insights without requiring full real-time integration with planning and execution processes. This extraction maintains prediction accuracy while significantly reducing implementation time and costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses a relatively simple machine learning model that can be deployed and updated independently of expensive real-time integration infrastructure. This approach provides accurate predictions at lower cost and with faster implementation, effectively replacing the need for complex, costly real-time data integration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Data Source

PatentUS20250225473A1System and Method to Predict Service Level Failure in Supply Chains
Publication Date: 2025.07.10 BLUE YONDER GROUP INC
  • US20250225473A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225473A1 patent drawing
  • US20250225473A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method are disclosed for a low-touch centralized system to predict service level failure in a supply chain using machine learning. Embodiments include receiving only historical supply chain data from an archiving system for one or more supply chain entities storing items at stocking locations, predicting one or more supply chain events during a prediction period by applying a predictive model to a sample of historical supply chain data, calculating an occurrence risk score for at least one of the one or more supply chain events and indicating a possibility that the at least one of the one or more supply chain events will occur, generating one or more alerts identifying at least one item and at least one alert stocking location, rendering an alert heatmap visualization comprising one or more selectable user interface elements, and provide one or more tools for initiating corrective actions to be undertaken.