Machine-Learning Video Object Tracking for Automated Privacy Redaction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Law enforcement agencies face challenges in efficiently identifying and managing large volumes of video data captured by officers, as existing systems lack precise control over object detection and require tedious manual redaction due to privacy and legal concerns.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing multiple single-purpose machine-learning models trained for specific object types, allowing users to selectively apply these models for detection, tracking, and redaction, with user interface controls for correction and training of new models.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual review and redaction of video content is performed, then privacy and legal concerns are addressed, but the process becomes very tedious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprivacy protection reliabilityVSAvoidvideo review time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical review process with an automated computer-based system that uses machine learning models to detect objects in video content. The system automatically identifies sensitive objects such as faces, license plates, and weapons, eliminating the need for tedious manual scanning while maintaining privacy protection through automated redaction capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service automated redaction by allowing users to configure redaction parameters and rules once, after which the system autonomously processes video content according to these settings. The automated object detection and rediction processes run without continuous human intervention, significantly reducing the time investment required for ongoing video processing while ensuring consistent privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple body-worn electronic devices are carried to capture comprehensive video data, then law enforcement functions are protected, but the volume of video data to be reviewed increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaw enforcement protectionVSAvoidvideo data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and identifies specific objects of interest from large volumes of video data using specialized machine learning models. By detecting and isolating particular objects such as faces, license plates, weapons, and other relevant entities, the system separates meaningful content from the overwhelming volume of video data, enabling efficient review and management while preserving all necessary law enforcement documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments video data processing by applying different machine learning models tailored to detect specific object types. Rather than attempting to analyze all video content uniformly, the system divides the processing task into specialized detection streams for different object categories, making the management of large video volumes from multiple devices more tractable and efficient.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If irrelevant video content is identified and redacted, then privacy and data sensitivity concerns are addressed, but the process requires significant time investment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata sensitivity protectionVSAvoidvideo processing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual identification and redaction processes with automated machine learning-based object detection systems. These models automatically identify sensitive content such as faces, personal information, and weapons, enabling rapid redaction of irrelevant or sensitive video content while maintaining data protection standards, thereby dramatically improving processing efficiency without compromising reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where detection results and redaction outcomes can be reviewed and used to refine detection parameters. This continuous improvement loop enhances the system's ability to accurately identify irrelevant content while reducing false positives, thereby improving both the reliability of data protection and the productivity of the redaction process over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12354306B2Systems and methods for tracking objects in videos using machine-learning models
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 GETAC TECH CORP
  • US12354306B2 patent drawing
  • US12354306B2 patent drawing
  • US12354306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A video file may be presented via a user application that displays one or more video frames of the video file. A user request to perform an object detection for objects of a specific object type in a video frame of the video file may be received from the user application. A machine-learning model of a plurality of machine-learning models that is configured to detect objects of the specific object type may be applied to the video frame to detect an object of the specific object type in the video frame. Each of the plurality of machine-learning models may be trained to detect objects of a corresponding object type. Subsequently, an object tracking algorithm may be applied to one or more additional video frames of the video file to track the object of the specific object type across the one or more additional video frames.