Machine Learning Wait-Time Prediction Across Order Locations

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Shoppers in online concierge systems often experience long wait times for desirable orders and are unaware of better order opportunities at nearby locations, leading to inefficient order fulfillment.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning model predicts wait times for shoppers based on current location, order volume, available shoppers, historical order data, and shopper information, suggesting alternative locations with shorter total wait times, and adjusts predictions based on real-time changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If shoppers wait for desirable orders at their current location, then order quality improves, but wait time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveorder qualityVSAvoidwait time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by predicting wait times at multiple locations before the shopper makes a decision. The machine learning model calculates expected wait times for various locations in advance, allowing the shopper to proactively choose the optimal location rather than passively waiting at the current location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts wait time predictions based on real-time changes in order availability and shopper distribution. The machine learning model continuously updates predictions as new orders are received and shoppers accept or reject orders, enabling adaptive decision-making about location selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If shoppers are limited to orders within their current geographical area, then local order fulfillment improves, but access to better orders decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocal order fulfillmentVSAvoidaccess to orders
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system adds a spatial dimension to order matching by considering multiple geographical locations simultaneously. Instead of limiting shoppers to a single location, the system evaluates wait times across multiple locations and recommends optimal destinations, effectively transforming the problem from one-dimensional (current location only) to multi-dimensional (multiple potential locations).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of operation

If the system provides real-time wait time predictions, then shopper decision-making improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshopper decision-makingVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where machine learning models continuously learn from actual wait time outcomes to improve future predictions. The system monitors whether shoppers accept or reject recommended locations and uses this feedback to refine prediction accuracy, creating a self-improving system that becomes more efficient over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model performs self-service by automatically updating predictions and recommendations without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously processes new order data, recalculates wait times, and provides updated recommendations as conditions change, reducing the need for complex manual computation management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250299214A1Machine learning model for predicting wait times to receive orders at different locations
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 MAPLEBEAR INC
  • US20250299214A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299214A1 patent drawing
  • US20250299214A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method or system for dynamically optimizing order fulfillment wait times for shoppers using machine learning. The system identifies a shopper's current location via their client device. A trained machine learning model predicts: (i) a first wait time for receiving orders at the current location, (ii) a second wait time at an alternate location, and (iii) a travel time between the two locations. The model is trained using labeled data of shopper wait times, iteratively refining parameters to minimize prediction error. A combined wait time for the alternate location is computed by summing the predicted second wait time and the travel time. If the combined wait time is shorter than the wait time at the current location, the system suggests the alternate location to the shopper. Instructions are transmitted to the shopper's device to display a user interface with a map, the suggested route, and a recommendation indicator.