Machine Learning Impact Scoring for Webpage Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods lack the ability to predict the impact of webpage updates on performance and conversion rates before deployment, leading to potential negative effects on user engagement and business outcomes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method using machine learning models to predict the impact of webpage updates on performance and conversion metrics, allowing for strategic deployment decisions based on predicted impact scores and predefined rules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If webpage updates are deployed without impact prediction, then deployment speed is fast, but performance and conversion rates may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidperformance and conversion rates
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary impact prediction using machine learning models before deploying webpage updates. The ML model analyzes proposed changes against historical data and performance metrics to forecast potential impacts on conversion rates and user engagement, allowing deployment decisions to be made based on predicted outcomes rather than post-deployment trial and error.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where actual performance data from deployed webpages is continuously collected and used to retrain and refine the machine learning model. This feedback mechanism enables the model to improve its prediction accuracy over time, creating a self-improving system that learns from actual user behavior and deployment outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If impact prediction system is implemented, then reliability of performance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance prediction accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a virtual copy or simulation of the webpage update process using machine learning models. Instead of physically testing every possible update combination, the system uses the ML model to simulate and predict outcomes, effectively copying the complexity of real-world deployment scenarios into a manageable computational framework that can be analyzed without actual deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms complex webpage update scenarios into quantifiable parameters and features that the machine learning model can process. By converting qualitative changes in webpage design and structure into measurable parameters (such as expected conversion rate changes, load time impacts, and engagement metrics), the system reduces the complexity of analyzing update impacts while maintaining prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive performance metrics are tracked, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance metric accuracyVSAvoiddata processing overhead
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts and focuses on the most critical performance metrics that directly impact business outcomes, such as conversion rates, user engagement time, and bounce rates. By selectively tracking only these high-impact metrics rather than attempting to monitor every possible webpage parameter, the system maintains measurement precision for what matters most while reducing the overall information processing burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary identification and selection of relevant performance metrics during the update evaluation phase, before actual deployment occurs. The machine learning model determines which metrics are most predictive of success for each specific update type, allowing the system to focus data collection and analysis efforts on the most informative metrics rather than tracking everything equally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4625207A1System and method for managing updates to webpages
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 INFOSYS LTD
  • EP4625207A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4625207A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4625207A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method for managing updates includes receiving a first set of elements indicative of a first set of updates to be made to a first webpage that is currently deployed. Prior to deployment of the updated first webpage, a first impact score indicative of an impact of the first set of updates on a set of performance metrics associated with the first webpage is predicted. A first deployment strategy is selected from a plurality of pre-defined deployment strategies based on the predicted first impact score and a set of rules. The first deployment strategy is executed for updating and deployment of the first webpage based on the first set of updates.