Machine Operation Recognition Pipeline for Context-Rich Threat Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern network monitoring systems face challenges in interpreting vast volumes of network sensor events, which lack contextual information about user or machine activities, leading to resource wastage and potential gaps in detecting novel attack methods.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a network data interpretation pipeline that classifies network sensor events into machine operations and activities, using recognition engines to organize data into human-friendly structures, reducing data volume, and enabling continuous learning and threat detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If network sensors continuously monitor and upload all network traffic metadata to a centralized platform, then comprehensive network security monitoring is achieved, but resource usage increases and security concerns are raised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork security monitoringVSAvoidresource usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the network monitoring system into distributed network sensors that collect metadata locally and a centralized platform that receives processed information. Each sensor operates independently to monitor its local network segment, uploading only relevant security-related data rather than all traffic metadata, thereby reducing resource consumption while maintaining comprehensive monitoring coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the essential security-related features and anomalies from the raw network traffic metadata at the sensor level before transmission. By filtering and selecting only critical information for upload to the centralized platform, the system achieves comprehensive security monitoring with significantly reduced data transmission and processing resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Loss of information

If network sensors upload all raw sensor events to the centralized platform, then complete network traffic information is available, but data upload volume becomes excessive and processing becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenetwork traffic informationVSAvoiddata upload volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary processing of network sensor events at the distributed sensor level before upload. Network sensors pre-analyze traffic patterns, identify anomalies, and aggregate relevant information locally, so that only processed and condensed security-related data is transmitted to the centralized platform, reducing upload volume while preserving essential information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms raw network traffic metadata from a high-dimensional, voluminous format into a lower-dimensional representation by extracting key security features and aggregating traffic patterns. This dimensional reduction maintains the essential security information while dramatically reducing the quantity of data that needs to be uploaded and processed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If network monitoring systems analyze only known patterns of suspicious behavior, then detection of known threats is effective, but novel attack patterns are missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethreat detection accuracyVSAvoiddetection of novel attacks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the centralized platform continuously analyzes uploaded network sensor data, identifies novel attack patterns, and updates detection models and rules that are then distributed back to network sensors. This closed-loop system enables the network to adapt to new threats while maintaining precise detection of known attack patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs dynamic detection models that can adapt their parameters and thresholds based on evolving network traffic patterns and emerging threats. The system transitions from static signature-based detection to dynamic behavior-based detection, allowing it to effectively identify both known threats and novel attack patterns by learning from continuous data analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Measurement precision

If considerable technical knowledge and labor are invested to sift through sensor events, then accurate reconstruction of network activities is achieved, but time and resource consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactivity reconstruction accuracyVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer of automated analysis between raw sensor events and human analysts. The system automatically correlates sensor events, reconstructs network activities, and presents processed information in an intuitive format, eliminating the need for analysts to manually sift through raw data while maintaining accurate activity reconstruction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12634307B2Machine operation recognition engine with automated machine learning model update
Publication Date: 2026.05.19 RAPID7 INC
  • US12634307B2 patent drawing
  • US12634307B2 patent drawing
  • US12634307B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed to implement a network data interpretation pipeline to recognize machine operations (MOs) and machine activities (MAs) from network traffic data observed in a monitored network. In embodiments, a MO recognition engine is implemented in the network to recognize MOs from network sensor events (NSEs) based on defined recognition patterns. The MOs and any unrecognized NSEs are uploaded to a network monitoring system, where they are further analyzed by a MA recognition engine to recognize higher-level machine activities performed by machines. The NSEs, MOs, and MAs are used by the network monitoring system to implement a variety of security threat detection processes. Advantageously, the pipeline may be used to add rich contextual information about the raw network data to facilitate security threat detection processes. Additionally, the MOs and MAs can be used to present the raw network data in a variety of intuitive user interfaces.