Machine Identification via Operational Signature Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying machines and components are hindered by the ability of thieves to alter or remove identification markings, and law enforcement lacks proper training to accurately identify machines with altered information, making it difficult to locate stolen or missing equipment.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that generates a unique machine signature value based on operational characteristics, which is stored and compared to verify the identity of machines and components, using a data communication system with an electronic control module, gateway processor, transceiver, and GPS device to transmit and receive data for identification and location purposes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If traditional identification markings (labels, etchings) are used to identify machines, then the identification process is simple and straightforward, but the markings can be removed or altered by thieves to change the identification information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentification processVSAvoididentification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical/physical identification markings (labels, etchings) with an electronic identification system that uses electronic tags (RFID, barcode, or other machine-readable tags) attached to the machine. This electronic system can be read remotely by law enforcement devices, eliminating the need for physical inspection of markings that can be easily altered or removed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates an electronic copy or digital representation of the machine's identification information stored in an electronic tag. This digital copy can be remotely accessed and verified against a database, providing a reliable identification method that doesn't depend on physical markings that can be tampered with.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Ease of operation

If law enforcement officials manually inspect identification information on machines, then the process is straightforward, but they lack proper training to identify machines with altered information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinspection processVSAvoididentification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the electronic tag reader captures identification data from the machine, automatically transmits it to a central database for verification, and receives immediate feedback on whether the machine is authorized or stolen. This automated feedback loop eliminates the need for law enforcement officers to manually interpret identification markings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection by law enforcement officers with an automated electronic reading system. The electronic tag can be read remotely using specialized devices, and the data is automatically compared against a database, eliminating human error and the need for specialized training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Extent of automation

If electronic labels with transmission devices are used to store identification codes, then automatic identification is enabled, but the system relies solely on registration numbers that can be altered and replaced by false numbers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic identificationVSAvoididentification security
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-registering machines in a centralized database with their unique electronic tag identifiers before they are ever stolen. When a machine is scanned by law enforcement, the system immediately checks the database to verify if the electronic tag matches a registered machine. This pre-established database provides a foundation for reliable identification that cannot be easily compromised.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS7677452B2Method and system for providing signatures for machines
Publication Date: 2010.03.16 CATERPILLAR INC
  • US7677452B2 patent drawing
  • US7677452B2 patent drawing
  • US7677452B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for identifying a machine and/or machine component includes storing an algorithm for generating a machine signature value associated with the machine and/or machine component. The method also includes receiving a first set of machine data from the machine and/or machine component. The machine data reflects at least one operational characteristic of the machine and/or machine component. The method also includes generating, using the algorithm, a first machine signature value based on the first set of machine data, storing the first machine signature value, and accessing the stored first machine signature value to verify the identity of the machine and/or machine component.