Machine Protection Diagnostic System Subsystem Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smaller industrial machines, particularly in medium/low voltage applications, often go unmonitored due to cost constraints, leading to potential malfunctions or breakdowns that can indirectly cause process failures and losses, as existing monitoring solutions are not economically viable for these assets.

Innovation Solution

A machine protection and diagnostic system that classifies machines with rotating parts into sub-systems, using sensors and protection models to determine performance indices and generate alarm or trip signals when health thresholds are exceeded, enabling preemptive monitoring and protection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional monitoring solutions are implemented for smaller industrial machines, then machine reliability and fault detection capability are improved, but the cost of monitoring solution becomes prohibitively high relative to asset cost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachine reliabilityVSAvoidcost of monitoring solution
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine is divided into multiple sub-systems (electrical, mechanical, control systems), and monitoring is selectively applied to critical sub-systems rather than the entire machine. This segmentation allows cost-effective monitoring of only the most important components while maintaining overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is designed to be multi-functional, serving both diagnostic purposes (identifying faults) and protective purposes (preventing damage). This universal approach consolidates multiple monitoring functions into a single cost-effective system rather than requiring separate specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If selective monitoring of critical sub-systems is implemented, then monitoring cost is reduced, but the capability to detect incipient faults across the entire machine is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring costVSAvoidfault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors performance parameters and provides feedback when deviations from normal operation are detected. This feedback mechanism enables early fault detection in critical sub-systems, allowing preventive action before failures propagate to other parts of the machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary diagnostics by monitoring performance parameters and identifying incipient faults before they develop into critical failures. This preliminary detection in critical sub-systems prevents cascading failures that would affect the entire machine.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Loss of information

If comprehensive monitoring of all machine components is implemented, then complete fault detection capability is achieved, but maintenance costs and system complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplete fault detectionVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Different monitoring strategies and levels of detail are applied to different sub-systems based on their criticality. Critical sub-systems receive detailed monitoring while less critical components receive simplified or no monitoring, optimizing the balance between fault detection capability and maintenance cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3299919B1Machine protection and diagnostic systems and methods
Publication Date: 2019.07.17 GENERAL ELECTRIC TECH GMBH
  • EP3299919B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3299919B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3299919B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

One or more embodiments of the disclosure pertain to a protection and diagnostic system (115) that can generate a trip/alarm signal by executing a diagnostic procedure upon a machine (105) that includes a rotating part. The diagnostic procedure can include using sensors (111) to obtain performance parameters of various tagged critical and/or less critical sub-systems (106) of the machine when the rotating part is rotating; determining, in real time, a system performance index of the machine (105) based on the performance parameters; using a protection model (118) to determine a sub-system performance index associated with at least one tagged sub-system (106) of the machine (101); determining an asset health index based on combining the system performance index and the sub-system performance index; and generating the trip/alarm signal when the asset health index exceeds a threshold value. The protection system (116) can include a protection device configured to receive the trip signal and execute a protective action upon the machine (105).