Machine Resource Transactions for Adaptive Energy and Compute Markets

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing demand for efficient and flexible management of energy and compute resources in distributed markets, particularly in the context of blockchain and AI applications, is hindered by volatility in energy costs, resource availability, and market uncertainties, necessitating a system that can adapt and optimize resource allocation.

Innovation Solution

A transaction-enabling system that includes a controller with resource requirement circuits, market access, and distribution circuits, utilizing machine learning and AI to determine resource needs, access resource markets, and execute transactions efficiently, particularly in spot and forward markets for energy and compute resources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If distributed ledger and blockchain operations are used to enable decentralized transactions, then reliability and trust in transactions are improved, but energy consumption increases due to proof-of-work mining operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction trustVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameters of blockchain nodes by dynamically adjusting their participation in mining operations based on energy prices and resource availability. Nodes can switch between active mining and idle states, changing their energy consumption parameters while maintaining transaction validation capabilities through alternative consensus mechanisms or reduced participation during high-energy-cost periods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic behavior to previously static blockchain nodes. Nodes continuously monitor energy prices, resource availability, and market conditions, then dynamically adjust their operational state. This allows the network to maintain reliability through adaptive node participation while reducing overall energy consumption during periods of high energy costs or low resource availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Power

If energy-intensive computing operations are used for blockchain mining and AI applications, then computational power and transaction processing capability are improved, but operational costs increase due to energy consumption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational powerVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback loops where blockchain nodes continuously monitor energy prices, computational resource availability, and their own operational status. This feedback information is used to adjust mining intensity, node activation, and resource allocation in real-time. When energy prices are low or resources are abundant, nodes increase computational power; when prices rise or resources become scarce, nodes reduce operations, thereby optimizing the balance between computational power and operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Blockchain nodes autonomously manage their own energy consumption and computational resource allocation without requiring centralized control. Each node independently monitors market conditions and adjusts its own operational parameters, making self-service decisions about when to mine, how intensely to compute, and when to enter idle states. This decentralized self-management optimizes the trade-off between computational power output and energy cost input at the individual node level.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated agents and machines are used to execute transactions in distributed markets, then productivity and transaction speed are improved, but system complexity increases due to coordination among multiple participants

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal protocol that enables diverse automated agents and blockchain nodes to interact through standardized interfaces and communication mechanisms. This universal framework allows different types of participants (mining nodes, AI agents, trading bots) to cooperate without requiring complex custom integration for each pair of participants. The standardized protocol handles coordination, transaction execution, and state synchronization, thereby maintaining high productivity while reducing the complexity burden that would otherwise arise from heterogeneous participant interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11810027B2Systems and methods for enabling machine resource transactions
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 STRONG FORCE TX PORTFOLIO 2018 LLC
  • US11810027B2 patent drawing
  • US11810027B2 patent drawing
  • US11810027B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure describes transaction-enabling systems and methods for enabling machine resource transactions. A system can include a machine having at least one of a compute task requirement, a networking task requirement, and an energy consumption task requirement; and a controller. The controller can include a resource requirement circuit to determine an amount of a resource for the machine to service task requirement, a resource market circuit to access a resource market, and a resource distribution circuit to execute a transaction of the resource on the resource market in response to the determined amount of the resource.