Machine Room Monitoring for Stuck Workpiece Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine tools face issues with workpieces getting stuck in the machine room, leading to potential damage and safety hazards when tools are adjusted, as existing methods fail to reliably detect stuck workpieces during the processing cycle.

Innovation Solution

A method involving sensors that generate start and end signals based on the workpiece's rear end as it enters and exits the machine room, using the theoretical feed path and feed rate to determine if the workpiece has passed through safely, with a controller monitoring these signals to detect any obstructions and generate release signals accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If workpieces are processed continuously through the machine room, then productivity is improved, but the risk of workpieces getting stuck and causing damage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous processingVSAvoidworkpiece stagnation damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection by monitoring the theoretical feed path and comparing it with actual position data before the workpiece completes its journey through the machine room. This allows the control to identify potential stagnation issues early and trigger appropriate responses before damage occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where sensors continuously monitor workpiece position, the control calculates theoretical feed path based on drive shaft rotation, and compares this with actual position. This closed-loop feedback enables real-time detection of deviations indicating workpiece stagnation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If tools are adjusted to new positions, then adaptability is improved, but the risk of collision with stuck workpieces increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool position adjustmentVSAvoidcollision damage
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Before tool adjustment operations are permitted, the system performs a preliminary check by verifying that no workpieces are present in the machine room through the sensor monitoring system. This preliminary action prevents tool adjustment until the machine room is confirmed clear, eliminating collision risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by blocking tool adjustment commands until the monitoring system confirms the machine room is clear of workpieces. This preemptive blocking prevents the harmful action of tool collision with stuck workpieces before it can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Ease of operation

If feed rollers are raised while workpieces are in the machine room, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of workpieces being knocked back increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeed roller adjustmentVSAvoidworkpiece knockback
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs a preliminary verification through sensor monitoring to confirm the machine room is clear of workpieces before permitting feed roller raising operations. This preliminary check ensures that feed rollers can be safely adjusted without risking knockback of workpieces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system provides continuous feedback on workpiece position, enabling the control to determine when it is safe to raise feed rollers. This feedback mechanism ensures operational safety by preventing feed roller adjustment until workpieces have cleared the machine room.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Measurement precision

If sensors monitor the entire feed path, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece position detectionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential monitoring points - entry and exit areas of the machine room - rather than continuously monitoring the entire feed path. This selective extraction maintains sufficient measurement precision for detecting workpiece stagnation while significantly reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system serves multiple functions: detecting workpiece entry, detecting workpiece exit, calculating theoretical feed path, and determining machine room occupancy status. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated sensors for each function, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentEP3017922B1Method for monitoring the machinery space of a processing machine, especially of a moulder, and processing machine, in particular a moulder, for carrying out such a method
Publication Date: 2021.12.22 MICHAEL WEINIG AG
  • EP3017922B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3017922B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3017922B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

With the method, the machine room of a processing machine is monitored as workpieces (1) pass through, in order to detect workpieces that have got stuck. The rear end of the workpiece (1) in the transport direction generates a start signal in the entry area of ​​the machine room and an end signal in the exit area by means of sensors (29, 30) connected to a controller (32). From the start signal onwards, the controller (32) detects a feature that characterizes a theoretical feed path and generates a release signal if, at the time the end signal is generated, the value of the detected characteristic feature has reached a predetermined limit value and preferably has not yet exceeded a predetermined upper limit value or if the end signal is generated at a point in time at which the value of the detected characteristic feature has reached the predetermined limit value and preferably has not yet exceeded the upper limit value.