Machine Safeguarding via Sensor Detection Capability Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing safety technologies face challenges in reliably determining the detection capability of sensors in dynamic environments, particularly when dealing with poor image quality or interference, which can lead to hazardous misjudgments.

Innovation Solution

A method and safeguarding system that utilize machine learning to evaluate sensor data and determine the quality of the detection capability, allowing for reliable estimation of hazardous situations even in dynamic or poorly lit environments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional sensors (light grids, laser scanners) are used for safety monitoring, then the system satisfies high safety demands (EN13849, IEC61496), but the system cannot reliably determine detection capability in dynamic environments with poor image quality or interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring reliabilityVSAvoiddetection capability in dynamic environments
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static safety monitoring to dynamic environmental assessment by continuously evaluating sensor data quality. The system adapts to changing lighting conditions, interference levels, and image quality by computing a time-varying detection capability value that reflects current environmental suitability for safe operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being monitored from binary safety detection to continuous detection capability assessment. By computing a detection capability value based on multiple sensor parameters (image quality, interference levels, lighting conditions), the system can dynamically adjust operational parameters to maintain safety margins in varying environmental conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If neural networks are used to evaluate sensor data in safety engineering, then the system can handle complex dynamic environments, but it becomes difficult to demonstrate detection capability and reveal defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling complex dynamic environmentsVSAvoiddetection capability verification
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring sensor data quality and computing a detection capability value that reflects the current reliability of the neural network's assessments. This feedback mechanism allows verification of detection capability by comparing actual sensor data quality against required thresholds, enabling defect revelation when quality deteriorates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection capability assessment layer between the neural network and safety decisions. This intermediary computes objective quality metrics (image quality, interference levels) that mediate between the complex neural network processing and the verifiable safety requirements, enabling demonstration of detection capability without sacrificing adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the sensor data quality is insufficient (poor illumination, interference), then the neural network may fail to recognize hazardous objects, but the system cannot identify the reason for failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation in challenging conditionsVSAvoidreason identification for detection failure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of sensor data quality before neural network processing by evaluating illumination conditions, interference levels, and image quality metrics. This preliminary action identifies potential failure reasons in advance, allowing the system to prepare appropriate responses or alert operators before hazardous objects are missed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250147479A1Safeguarding a machine
Publication Date: 2025.05.08 SICK AG
  • US20250147479A1 patent drawing
  • US20250147479A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of safeguarding a machine is provided in which a sensor monitors the machine and generates data thereon that are evaluated so that a hazardous situation is recognized and the machine is safeguarded in the event of a hazardous situation, wherein a check is made in a detection capability check whether an estimation of a hazardous situation is possible and the machine is otherwise safeguarded. In this respect, the sensor data are evaluated in a process of machine learning having at least one figure of quality in the detection capability check and an estimation of a hazardous situation is only considered possible with a sufficient figure of quality.