Machine Tool Control Using Acoustic Feedback for Quality Stability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine tools face issues with inconsistent processing quality due to machine fatigue and operator's inability to adjust parameters in real time, leading to uneven product quality and potential scrapping of entire batches.

Innovation Solution

A control system and method that includes an electronic device with input, correction, and calculation units to predict processing quality, adjust tool position, and compensate for non-parallel conditions using sensors and mechanisms for automatic centering and multi-angle variability, ensuring consistent processing quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If operator adjusts parameters based on experience and sample roughness, then processing can be performed, but processing quality becomes uneven due to machine fatigue and inability to detect force changes in real time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing quality consistencyVSAvoidreal-time parameter adjustment capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs acoustic emission sensors to detect force changes during grinding in real time, creating a feedback loop that continuously monitors processing conditions. The sensor signals are transmitted to a control system that automatically adjusts grinding parameters based on detected force variations, eliminating the delay and inaccuracy of manual operator adjustment based on sample inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical adjustment system with an automated electronic control system. Instead of operators physically adjusting parameters based on experience, the system uses acoustic emission detection combined with electronic control to automatically modify grinding parameters, substituting human judgment with sensor-based detection and automated response.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual parameter adjustment is used, then device complexity is low, but processing quality stability deteriorates due to machine fatigue and operator limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing quality stabilityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system continuously receives acoustic emission sensor signals during grinding operations and automatically adjusts parameters in real time. This closed-loop feedback mechanism maintains processing quality stability by compensating for machine fatigue effects without requiring complex manual intervention systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs self-adjustment by automatically detecting force changes through acoustic emission sensors and modifying grinding parameters without operator intervention. The control system serves itself by using its own sensor data to make real-time parameter adjustments, eliminating the need for external manual adjustment mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If no real-time detection system is used, then device complexity is low, but ability to detect and measure force changes deteriorates, leading to uneven product quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforce change detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces direct mechanical force measurement with acoustic emission detection. Instead of using complex mechanical sensors to measure force changes, the system detects the acoustic signals generated by force variations during grinding, providing indirect but effective force change detection with simpler sensor technology.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The acoustic emission sensor acts as an intermediary between the grinding process and the control system. Rather than directly measuring force, the sensor detects acoustic signals that represent force changes, transmitting this information to the control system which then adjusts parameters accordingly. This intermediary approach simplifies the detection mechanism while maintaining measurement capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12566418B2Processing equipment and its control system and control method
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 IND TECH RES INST
  • US12566418B2 patent drawing
  • US12566418B2 patent drawing
  • US12566418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure provides a control system for controlling a processing equipment, and a control method thereof comprises: transmitting a processing signal to a processing unit via an input unit when the processing equipment generates the processing signal for processing a workpiece, so that the processing unit predicts a processing quality of the workpiece according to the processing signal and provides the processing quality as a reference information; and transmitting the reference information to a calculation unit when the processing quality of the workpiece does not meet a requirement, so as to calculate a compensation parameter to automatically adjust a working state of the processing equipment on the workpiece.