Machine Tool Braking With Energy Feedback and Brake Chopper Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine tool braking methods, such as short-circuit braking, brake choppers, and recuperation, face issues with user safety, tool ergonomics, hardware requirements, and inefficient energy recuperation, particularly when rapid deceleration is needed.

Innovation Solution

A method for braking a machine tool that involves regenerative braking, feeding back electrical energy into the power supply device or intermediate circuit, and using a brake chopper to absorb excess energy when limits are exceeded, without requiring a separate controller, by adjusting the duty cycle and current space vector based on correction factors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If recuperation is used to brake the machine tool, then electrical energy is fed back into the power supply device, but the power supply device may exceed its limit values for absorbing electrical energy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy recuperation efficiencyVSAvoidpower supply device safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors the electrical energy released during braking and compares it with the power supply device's absorption limits. Based on this feedback, the control unit dynamically adjusts the braking torque to ensure the released energy does not exceed the power supply device's capacity, thereby preventing damage while maximizing energy recuperation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The braking torque is dynamically adjusted during the braking process based on real-time monitoring of the power supply device's energy absorption capacity. The control unit modifies the braking characteristics adaptively, transitioning between different braking modes (recuperation, regenerative, and mechanical braking) to optimize both energy recovery and device protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If a brake chopper is installed to absorb excess braking energy, then the power supply device is protected from damage, but the machine tool's weight and volume increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply device protectionVSAvoidmachine tool weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit utilizes existing components (motor, power electronics, sensors) already present in the machine tool to perform the function of energy management during braking. By intelligently controlling the motor's operating mode and coordinating with the power supply device's capabilities, the system protects itself from damage without requiring additional dedicated braking components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The motor serves multiple functions: it acts as both a drive motor during operation and as a generator during braking to recover energy. The power electronics that originally served only for motor control are also utilized for managing regenerative braking and coordinating with the power supply device, eliminating the need for separate brake chopper hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Speed

If short-circuit braking is used, then rapid deceleration is achieved, but the machine tool's electronics must handle high initial short-circuit currents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeceleration rateVSAvoidelectronics durability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The braking process is dynamically controlled with continuously adjustable braking torque, transitioning smoothly from maximum recuperative braking to mechanical braking as needed. This dynamic control avoids the abrupt current spikes of short-circuit braking while maintaining effective deceleration performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit prepares for the braking process in advance by pre-coordinating with the power supply device to establish its energy absorption capacity. This preliminary preparation allows the system to absorb the braking energy gradually through controlled recuperation, cushioning against the shock loads that would otherwise damage the electronics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

4Reliability

If the braking process is performed slowly to avoid exceeding power supply device limits, then the power supply device is protected, but user safety is compromised in rapid deceleration scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower supply device protectionVSAvoiduser safety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The braking process is segmented into multiple phases: initial recuperative braking to maximize energy recovery, followed by mechanical braking when the power supply device approaches its absorption limits. This segmentation allows the system to protect the power supply device while still achieving rapid overall deceleration through the coordinated action of different braking mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The braking system combines multiple braking mechanisms (recuperative braking, regenerative braking, and mechanical braking) into a composite braking solution. Each mechanism contributes to the overall braking performance, allowing the system to achieve both power supply device protection and rapid deceleration for user safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables rapid, safe braking with efficient energy recuperation, reducing tool size and weight, and minimizing power loss, while protecting the power supply device and user from damage.

Implementation Method 1

During the braking process, the motor (12) is braked in a controlled manner and thus becomes a generator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

The brake chopper (18) has a duty cycle D, which is determined by the correction factor kRed, in order to absorb an amount of electrical energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentEP4661280A1Method for braking a machine tool and machine tool
Publication Date: 2025.12.10 HILTI AG
  • EP4661280A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4661280A1 patent drawingFigure 2a
  • EP4661280A1 patent drawingFigure 2b

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method for braking a machine tool (10), wherein the machine tool (10) is a battery-powered or mains-powered machine tool and has a brake chopper, and electrical energy released when braking the machine tool (10) is fed back at least partially into a power supply device (14) or an intermediate circuit of the machine tool (10).