Machine Tool Chatter Control Using Spindle Amplitude Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling chattering in machine tools are inefficient, requiring operator-dependent adjustments of spindle rotation amplitude and variable period, which can lead to prolonged stabilization times, potential damage, and inconsistent results due to subjective judgments.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method using an acceleration sensor to detect chattering, a monitor to display chattering values and correction directions, and a control unit to automatically or manually adjust spindle rotation amplitude and variable period based on predetermined thresholds, reducing chattering through precise adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If operator manually adjusts rotation amplitude and variable period based on empirical judgment, then chattering control flexibility is maintained, but stabilization time increases and consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechattering control flexibilityVSAvoidstabilization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors chattering levels through vibration sensors and automatically adjusts spindle parameters based on real-time feedback, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error adjustments while maintaining optimal chattering control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The chattering control system performs self-adjustment of rotation amplitude and variable period based on automated detection algorithms, enabling the machine tool to stabilize chattering independently without operator intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Object-generated harmful factors

If operator repeatedly changes spindle parameters to stabilize chattering, then chattering reduction is achieved, but machine tool damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechattering levelVSAvoidmachine tool durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-generated harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system detects chattering trends and applies corrective parameter adjustments before severe chattering occurs, preventing damage while maintaining machining quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Real-time vibration monitoring provides continuous feedback on chattering severity, enabling the control system to apply minimal necessary adjustments rather than repeated aggressive parameter changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If automated chattering detection and control is implemented, then stabilization speed increases, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestabilization timeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system integrates multiple functions including vibration detection, chattering analysis, parameter optimization, and spindle control into a single unified platform, avoiding the need for separate dedicated devices for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses existing spindle control infrastructure as an intermediary to implement automated chattering control, leveraging available communication protocols and control interfaces rather than requiring completely new hardware architectures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution stabilizes chattering quickly and effectively, improving machining precision, reducing vibration and noise, and preventing damage to the machine tool, while allowing for intuitive manual adjustments.

Implementation Method 1

an acceleration sensor installed at a forced frequency part of the machine tool to detect a chattering signal of the machine tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration detection: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS20250381635A1Apparatus of controlling chattering of machine tool and method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.12.18 DN SOLUTIONS CO LTD
  • US20250381635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381635A1 patent drawing
  • US20250381635A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus of controlling a chattering of a machine tool includes an acceleration sensor installed at a forced frequency part of the machine tool to detect a chattering signal of the machine tool; a monitor including a chattering output unit for displaying a chattering value in a graph form, a chattering correction direction display unit for outputting an increase or a decrease of a rotation amplitude and a rotation amplitude variable period, and a parameter input unit for inputting an increase or a decrease ratio of the rotation amplitude and a time corresponding to the rotation amplitude variable period; and a control unit for adjusting the rotation amplitude and the rotation amplitude variable period manually or automatically, which stabilizes the chattering of the machine tool and reduces a vibration and a noise caused by the chattering and prevents abnormal wear and damage to the machine tool.