Machine Tool Chatter Control With User-Defined Vibration Rules

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for preventing chatter in machine tools are often ineffective and require manual operator intervention, which is not universally successful and can reduce productivity.

Innovation Solution

A method that allows operators to incorporate their experience into the machining process by selecting and parameterizing predefined rules for adjusting machining parameters to prevent chatter, including hold times and parameter changes that do not affect the workpiece contour, with the system storing successful adjustments for future use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the feed rate and/or spindle speed are reduced to prevent chatter, then chatter is eliminated, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter preventionVSAvoidmachining speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts machining parameters (feed rate, spindle speed) in real-time based on detected vibration levels. Instead of using fixed reduced parameters, the control system continuously monitors chatter and adapts parameters during machining, allowing operation at optimal speeds while preventing chatter when detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where vibrations are detected by sensors, evaluated by the control device, and used to automatically adjust machining parameters. This feedback loop enables the system to respond to chatter conditions and restore stable machining without permanent parameter reduction

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual operator intervention is used to adjust feed rate and spindle speed, then chatter can be rapidly reduced, but the solution is not universally successful and requires continuous operator attention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter controlVSAvoidoperator intervention requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control device autonomously monitors vibrations, evaluates chatter conditions, and adjusts machining parameters without requiring operator intervention. The system serves itself by automatically detecting problems and implementing corrections, freeing the operator from continuous monitoring while maintaining reliable chatter control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses automated feedback loops where sensor data is continuously processed by the control device, which automatically modifies machining parameters in response to detected chatter. This replaces manual operator judgment and action with an automated control system that consistently applies chatter prevention logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If machining parameters are modified to eliminate chatter, then vibration is reduced, but the modification may need to be maintained throughout the entire machining process, increasing processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevibration reductionVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies parameter modifications periodically and temporarily only when chatter is detected, rather than maintaining reduced parameters throughout the entire machining process. The control device monitors vibrations continuously and applies corrections only during problematic intervals, then restores original parameters when stable, minimizing time loss while maintaining vibration control when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3833509B1User-defined vibration avoidance
Publication Date: 2025.07.02 SIEMENS AG
  • EP3833509B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3833509B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3833509B1 patent drawingFigure 7~9

AI summary

The invention relates to a control device (6) of a machine tool, which control device receives a target machining (9), in accordance with which a workpiece (2) should be machined by means of a tool (1) of the machine tool. Before the machining of the workpiece (2), the control device (6) also receives a selection, a parameterization and/or a specification of a sequence of predefined rules (10) via a human-machine interface or an interface to a memory device arranged outside of the control device (6). The rules (10) define the manner in which the machining of the workpiece (2) should be modified in the case of undesired vibrations occurring during the machining of the workpiece (2). The control device (6) controls the machine tool such that the workpiece (2) is machined by means of the tool (1). During the machining of the workpiece (2), the control device (6) determines whether undesired vibrations occur by evaluating captured sensor signals (S). If the undesired vibrations do not occur, the control device (6) carries out the machining in accordance with the target machining (9). If the undesired vibrations occur, the control device (6) modifies the machining in accordance with the rules (10), in which case the control device (6) selects the rules (10) in accordance with the selection, parameterizes the rules in accordance with the parameterization, and/or, in accordance with the specification of the sequence, carries out the rules in said sequence.