Machine Tool Control System for Drive Axis Reversal Streaks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine tools often produce streaks or stripes on machined surfaces due to delays in drive axis reversal, such as backlash, which existing technologies fail to effectively detect and address.

Innovation Solution

A control system for machine tools that uses a vision sensor to capture images of the machined surface, performs image processing on the data, and identifies the drive axis causing failures by associating chronological control data with spatial machined surface measurement data from multiple machining directions, allowing for adjustment of the machining program to reduce drive axis ratios and minimize surface defects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If drive axis reversal is performed during machining, then machining coverage is improved, but streaks or stripes occur on the machined surface due to backlash and reversal delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining coverageVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the machining parameters by varying the machining direction (e.g., from X-axis primary to Y-axis primary) to alter which drive axis performs reversal operations. This parameter change allows the problematic reversal-induced streaks to be minimized by assigning reversal to a different axis with better performance characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the machining strategy by selecting different primary machining directions based on detected surface quality issues. When streaks are detected, the system switches from one machining direction configuration to another, making the machining process adaptive to the identified problems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If machining is performed in a single direction, then drive axis reversal is minimized, but machining coverage and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurface qualityVSAvoidmachining efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a dynamic machining approach where the primary machining direction is not fixed but can be switched based on detected surface quality. The system starts with one machining direction, monitors for streaks, and switches to an alternative direction (e.g., from X-primary to Y-primary machining) when quality degradation is detected, thereby maintaining both efficiency and surface quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the fundamental machining parameter of direction by utilizing multiple drive axes. Instead of being constrained to a single machining direction, the system can reconfigure which axis serves as the primary machining axis, allowing optimization of both productivity and surface quality through parameter variation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Area of stationary object

If multiple machining directions are used to improve coverage, then drive axis reversal operations increase, but this exacerbates backlash effects and surface defects

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining coverageVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system strategically changes the machining direction parameter only when necessary to eliminate surface defects. By switching from one primary machining axis to another (e.g., from X-axis to Y-axis primary), the system redistributes reversal operations to different axes, thereby maintaining machining coverage while minimizing the impact of backlash on any single axis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts the machining direction configuration based on real-time quality feedback. When streaks or stripes are detected on the machined surface, the system switches to an alternative machining direction that uses different drive axes for primary motion and reversal, thereby dynamically optimizing surface quality while maintaining coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If drive axis reversal speed is increased to improve productivity, then machining efficiency improves, but backlash effects and surface defects worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operational parameters by switching which drive axis performs reversal operations. When high-speed reversal on one axis causes surface defects, the system switches to an alternative machining direction where a different axis performs the reversal, thereby maintaining productivity while avoiding the backlash problems associated with high-speed reversal on the original axis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10585418B2Control system of machine tool
Publication Date: 2020.03.10 FANUC LTD
  • US10585418B2 patent drawing
  • US10585418B2 patent drawing
  • US10585418B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system of a machine tool includes an analysis device, the analysis device includes acquisition portions which acquire chronological control data when a work is machined and which acquire spatial machined surface measurement data after the machining of the work, a storage portion which stores the control data and the machined surface measurement data, a data-associating processing portion which associates the control data and the machined surface measurement data with each other in two machining directions, a machined surface failure detection portion which detects a failure on the machined surface of the work and a location thereof based on the machined surface measurement data in the two machining directions and an identification portion which identifies a drive axis that causes the failure from the detected failure and the machining direction of the control data corresponding to the detected failure location.