Machine Tool Dimension Prediction Using Driving State Features

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine tool technologies, such as those using neural networks and fuzzy inference, struggle to stably predict machining dimensions due to varying machining conditions and tool states, leading to inconsistent workpiece quality.

Innovation Solution

A machine tool machining dimensions prediction device comprising a driving state information acquirer, feature amount extractor, data analyzer, and machining quality prediction model generator, which collects and analyzes data from sensors to generate a regression-based prediction model for stable machining dimension prediction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If neural network learning is used to predict machining dimensions, then prediction capability is improved, but prediction stability deteriorates when number of tool types increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining dimension prediction accuracyVSAvoidprediction stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the machining dimension prediction into two distinct phases: a learning phase where the neural network is trained offline to establish the relationship between machining conditions and dimensions, and a prediction phase where the trained model is applied to actual machining. This segmentation allows the complex learning process to be completed once, ensuring stable and reliable predictions during subsequent machining operations without requiring continuous relearning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If neural network parameters are constantly updated to adapt to varying conditions, then adaptability is improved, but machining condition stability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to varying conditionsVSAvoidmachining condition stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs the adaptation action in advance during the learning phase, where the neural network parameters are trained and optimized using historical machining data. Once the learning is complete, the parameters are fixed and not updated during actual machining operations. This preliminary action ensures the model adapts to varying conditions without compromising the stability of machining conditions during production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If fuzzy inference is used to correct machining conditions, then condition adjustment capability is improved, but prediction reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining condition correction capabilityVSAvoidworkpiece quality prediction stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates the prediction function from the condition correction function. The neural network is dedicated solely to predicting machining dimensions based on input conditions, while condition corrections are handled separately. This extraction ensures that the prediction model's reliability is not compromised by the uncertainties inherent in fuzzy inference-based condition adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS11826865B2Machine tool machining dimensions prediction device, machine tool equipment abnormality determination device, machine tool machining dimensions prediction system, and machine tool machining dimensions prediction method
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11826865B2 patent drawing
  • US11826865B2 patent drawing
  • US11826865B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine tool machining dimensions prediction device (100) includes: a data collector (10) to acquire driving state information of a machine tool; a feature amount extractor (211) to extract a feature amount from the driving state information; a data analyzer (311) to analyze the extracted feature amount; and a machining quality prediction model generator (312) to generate, from the analyzed information, a prediction model of a machining dimension of a workpiece. The machine tool machining dimensions prediction device (100) applies the feature amount and the driving state information to the prediction model during machining of the workpiece to predict a machining quality and refers to a machining dimension quality regulation to determine whether the machining quality satisfies a standard.