Machine Tool Operating Point Selection for System-Level Energy Savings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining energy-efficient operating points in machine tool systems focus on individual machines rather than their integration within a system, neglecting potential energy savings from coordinated operation among multiple machine tools.

Innovation Solution

A method to determine an energy-efficient operating point for machine tools within a system by using an energy requirement characteristic function that accounts for machine cycle time-dependent energy requirements over system cycle time, allowing for optimization of energy use across the entire machine tool system without altering other tools' operating points.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If individual machine tools are optimized for energy efficiency independently, then each machine's energy consumption is reduced, but the overall system energy efficiency is not maximized due to lack of coordination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidsystem coordination
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the energy optimization of multiple machine tools into a unified system-level approach. Instead of optimizing each machine tool independently, the system evaluates and coordinates the operating points of all machine tools together, considering their interdependencies and the overall system cycle time, thereby maximizing total energy efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the machine cycle times and energy consumption data of individual machine tools to adjust and coordinate their operating points. By continuously monitoring and adjusting based on system-wide performance, the system achieves optimal energy efficiency while maintaining production requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If the operating point of a machine tool is reduced to save energy, then energy consumption decreases, but the machine cycle time increases which may affect system productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidmachine cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the operating points of machine tools based on real-time conditions and system requirements. Rather than using fixed operating points, the system can adaptively change parameters to balance energy consumption and cycle time, optimizing the trade-off between energy efficiency and productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operating parameters of machine tools to achieve optimal energy efficiency. By adjusting parameters such as speed, feed rate, and power consumption within acceptable ranges, the system reduces energy consumption while maintaining machine cycle times that satisfy overall system productivity requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If machine cycle time is extended to reduce power consumption during operation, then instantaneous energy demand decreases, but total energy consumption over system cycle time may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower consumptionVSAvoidtotal energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic operation patterns where machine tools are coordinated to operate in cycles that align with the system cycle time. By synchronizing start and stop times of different machine tools, the system reduces peak power demands while ensuring that total energy consumption over the complete system cycle is minimized through optimal operating point selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentEP3314341B1Method and device for determining an energy-efficient operating point
Publication Date: 2023.01.25 ZF FRIEDRICHSHAFEN AG
  • EP3314341B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3314341B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP3314341B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for determining an energy-efficient operating point (31, 44, 45, 46) of a machine tool (2, 3, 4) of a machine tool system (1), wherein: identical workpieces (5) for processing can be chronologically supplied to the machine tool (2, 3, 4); the machine tool (2, 3, 4) has an operating point-dependent machine cycle time and an operating point-dependent power requirement; the machine-tool system comprises at least two machine tools (2, 3, 4) and has a system cycle time (t1); and the machine cycle time is less than the system cycle time (t1). The claimed method is characterised in that the energy-efficient operating point (31, 44, 45, 46) is determined according to an energy requirement characteristic function of the machine tool (2, 3, 4), wherein the energy requirement characteristic function represents a machine cycle time-dependent energy requirement of the machine tool (2, 3, 4) over the system cycle time (1). The invention further relates to a corresponding device (9, 24) and to a machine tool system (1).