Machine Tool Position Feedback Switching for Surface Finish Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In machine tools performing gentle inclined or tapered surface machining with multiple synchronized feed axes, existing position control systems face challenges in preventing interpolation errors from linear encoders, leading to striped patterns on machined surfaces, and lack direct detection of errors such as pitch errors and thermal expansions without linear encoders.

Innovation Solution

A position control system with each feed axis equipped with both an object position detector and a motor position detector, where position controllers select feedback values based on detected motor positions for axes with larger movements and object positions for those with smaller movements, allowing for direct detection of the controlled object's position and minimizing interpolation errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If linear encoders are used for position detection in gentle inclined or tapered surface machining, then direct detection of controlled object position is achieved, but interpolation errors cause striped patterns on machined surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition detection accuracyVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the position detection function into two independent detection systems: linear encoders for axes with larger movements and motor position detectors for axes with smaller movements. This segmentation allows each detector type to be optimized for its specific application, preventing interpolation errors from linear encoders from affecting gentle machining surfaces while maintaining direct detection capability where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different detection methods to different feed axes based on local requirements: axes controlling gentle inclined or tapered surfaces use motor position detectors to avoid interpolation errors, while other axes may use linear encoders for direct position detection. This local quality approach ensures each axis uses the most appropriate detection method for its specific machining function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If linear encoders are installed on all feed axes, then direct detection of controlled object position is enabled, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveposition detection capabilityVSAvoiddetection system configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the detection system multi-functional by enabling position controllers to selectively use either linear encoder data or motor position detector data as feedback values based on machining conditions. This universality allows the system to adapt to different machining requirements without requiring separate dedicated detection systems for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the feedback value parameter dynamically by allowing position controllers to switch between using linear encoder positions and motor position detector readings based on the specific machining operation. This parameter change enables the system to optimize detection accuracy for each machining scenario while maintaining system flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Manufacturing precision

If motor position detectors are used instead of linear encoders, then interpolation errors are eliminated, but direct detection of pitch errors and thermal expansions is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelimination of interpolation errorsVSAvoiddetection of mechanical errors
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a dynamic detection system where the feedback value source is not fixed but can switch between linear encoders and motor position detectors based on machining conditions. This dynamics allows the system to use motor position detectors for gentle machining to eliminate interpolation errors while using linear encoders for other operations where direct detection of mechanical errors like pitch errors and thermal expansions is beneficial.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11079734B2Position control system of a machine tool control drive based on motor and object position
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 OKUMA CORP
  • US11079734B2 patent drawing
  • US11079734B2 patent drawing
  • US11079734B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Respective amounts of movement of feed axes corresponding to first and second position controllers are determined, and if a value obtained by dividing a smaller amount of movement by a larger amount of movement, in the two amounts of movement, falls within a prescribed reference range, a position controller for the feed axis with the smaller amount of movement selects a detected motor position as a position feedback value and a position controller for the other feed axis selects a detected object position as a position feedback value.