Machine Tool Axis Control for Path-Specific Kinematic Tuning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Universal machine tools compromise on productivity, quality, and accuracy due to robust parameterization that fails to account for specific requirements of different workpieces, leading to longer processing times and reduced surface quality.

Innovation Solution

The control parameterization of a two-axis machine tool is adjusted based on the geometric description of the path, allowing for optimal setting of kinematic parameters such as path speed, acceleration, and jerk, tailored to specific sections of the path to meet individual requirements for productivity and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If robust parameterization is used for universal machine tool control, then the machine tool can be used stably and robustly for many different workpieces, but compromises must be made in machining time, surface quality, and accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniversal applicabilityVSAvoidmachining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adapts kinematic parameters (path speed, acceleration, jerk) based on the specific geometric description of the path and requirements of each workpiece. Instead of using fixed robust parameters for all workpieces, the system optimizes parameters in real-time according to the specific machining task, thereby improving productivity while maintaining universal applicability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the control approach by determining maximum values for kinematic parameters as a function of the geometric description of the path. This allows the system to adjust parameters like path speed and acceleration according to the specific geometry being machined, rather than using fixed conservative values, thus resolving the contradiction between universal robust control and optimized productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If robust parameterization is used for universal machine tool control, then the machine tool can be used stably and robustly for many different workpieces, but compromises must be made in surface quality and accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniversal applicabilityVSAvoidsurface quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control system dynamically adjusts kinematic parameters based on the specific geometric description and surface quality requirements of each workpiece. By optimizing parameters like path speed and acceleration according to the specific machining task rather than using fixed robust values, the system achieves both universal applicability and high surface quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters like maximum path speed and acceleration as a function of the geometric description of the path. This allows the control system to adapt to specific surface quality requirements of different workpieces while maintaining universal applicability, eliminating the need to compromise on surface quality for robust control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If fixed kinematic parameters are used for all path sections, then the control system is simple and universal, but productivity and quality cannot be optimized for specific path sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidthroughput time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The path is divided into sections, and for each section, the control system determines maximum values for kinematic parameters based on the geometric description of that specific section. This segmentation allows optimization for each path section while keeping the overall control approach systematic and manageable, improving productivity without excessive complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system determines maximum values for kinematic parameters as a function of the geometric description of each path section. This allows parameters to be optimized for specific sections (improving productivity) while using a systematic function-based approach that doesn't excessively increase control complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4147102B1Operation of a machine tool with at least two axes
Publication Date: 2024.04.03 SIEMENS AG
  • EP4147102B1 patent drawing
  • EP4147102B1 patent drawing
  • EP4147102B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating an at least two-axle machine tool (1). A geometric description of a path is specified, and according to the path, an advancing movement is carried out by moving a first axle (X1, X2, X3) and a second axle (X1, X2, X3) simultaneously at least in one section. A first maximum value for a first kinematic parameter relating to the advancing movement along the section of the path is ascertained by a control unit (2) on the basis of the geometric description, the advancing movement along the section is planned by means of the control unit (2) while taking the first maximum value into consideration, and the axles (X1, X2, X3) are actuated in order to carry out the advancing movement according to the planned movement.