Machine Tool Control for Vibration-Safe Parallel Machining

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Machine tools with multiple machining portions face challenges in maintaining machining accuracy and productivity due to vibrations affecting other operations, leading to increased cycle times when performing operations in parallel.

Innovation Solution

A machine tool configuration with multiple workpiece holders, working portions, and a control system that restricts the parallel execution of operations affected by vibrations, allowing other operations to proceed, thereby preventing vibration-induced inaccuracies and cycle time increases.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If machining is performed in parallel in multiple machining portions, then productivity is improved, but machining accuracy deteriorates due to vibration interference

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmachining accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The control portion segments the machining operations by identifying and separating vibration-prone operations from other operations. It divides the machining portions into groups where only operations that do not generate harmful vibrations are executed during active machining in other portions, thereby preventing vibration interference while maintaining parallel execution capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system applies different execution rules to different machining portions based on their vibration characteristics. Machining portions prone to generating vibrations are restricted during their operation, while other portions continue operating. This localized control approach allows parallel execution in non-interfering portions while maintaining accuracy in vibration-sensitive portions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If machining in one portion is restricted during another portion's operation, then machining accuracy is maintained, but cycle time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidcycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The control portion applies partial restriction rather than complete shutdown. Instead of stopping all machining operations when one portion is machining, it selectively restricts only those operations that would generate harmful vibrations. Other non-interfering operations continue in parallel, reducing the time loss while still protecting machining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains continuous useful action by allowing non-vibration-prone operations to continue executing in parallel during machining operations. This ensures that the machining capacity is not completely idle during restricted periods, thereby minimizing cycle time extension while maintaining machining accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Manufacturing precision

If all operations in a machining portion are stopped during another portion's machining, then vibration interference is prevented, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system segments operations into vibration-generating and non-vibration-generating categories. During machining in one portion, only the vibration-prone operations are restricted while non-vibration operations continue in parallel in other portions, preventing complete shutdown and maintaining productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control portion dynamically changes the operational parameters of different machining portions based on real-time machining status. When one portion is machining, the system adjusts the execution state of other portions by changing their operational parameters (from active to restricted or vice versa), enabling flexible parallel execution that maintains both accuracy and productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11491548B2Machine tool system that restricts parallel execution of predetermined operations by different tools
Publication Date: 2022.11.08 CITIZEN WATCH CO LTD
  • US11491548B2 patent drawing
  • US11491548B2 patent drawing
  • US11491548B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The machine tool includes modules and a control portion. Each of the modules includes a main spindle for holding a workpiece and a tool post for holding a tool. The tool is used to machine the workpiece held by the main spindle. The control portion is configured to control to restrict a parallel execution of predetermined machining for the workpiece and machining affected by the predetermined machining and to permit an execution of machining other than the restricted machining.