Machined Spring with Counter-Rotational Channels for Injector Heat Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional springs used in injectors, such as fuel injectors for gas turbine engines, face issues like loss of spring force due to heat, difficulty in assembly, increased part count, and larger size and weight, which affect their performance and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A machined spring design featuring opposed spring bases connected by a spring body with counter-rotational helical spring channels, which provides uniform stiffness, reduces buckling, and integrates a liquid strainer for improved flow and assembly, while being easier to manufacture and assemble.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If traditional wave springs are used to bias valve components, then spring force is provided, but the spring loses its spring force due to heat from welding operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat resistanceVSAvoidspring force retention
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring body is segmented into multiple counter-rotational helical channels instead of a single continuous spring, allowing the structure to resist thermal deformation and maintain spring force under heat exposure from welding operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The spring combines multiple material functions into a single machined component, integrating the spring body with strainer functionality and valve hold-down features, creating a composite structure that resists thermal effects while maintaining mechanical properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Ease of operation

If traditional springs are used in injectors, then spring function is achieved, but part count increases and assembly becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly easeVSAvoidpart count
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spring integrates multiple previously separate components into a single machined part, including the spring body, strainer, and valve hold-down features, thereby reducing part count and simplifying assembly operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The single spring component performs multiple functions simultaneously: providing spring biasing force, filtering liquid through integrated strainer features, and holding down valve components, eliminating the need for separate parts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Weight of moving object

If traditional springs are used, then spring function is provided, but size envelope and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespring weightVSAvoidspring performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring transitions from a conventional three-dimensional coil structure to a planar annular wall with helical channels, reducing the size envelope and weight while maintaining spring performance through the counter-rotational channel geometry

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional spring designs are used, then spring function is achieved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing easeVSAvoidspring structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention replaces traditional mechanical spring forming processes with machining processes that create the spring structure through counter-rotational helical channels in an annular wall, simplifying manufacturing while achieving the desired spring characteristics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The machined spring design enhances performance by reducing part count, size, and weight, improving assembly, and maintaining effectiveness even under heat exposure, thus offering superior reliability and efficiency in injector applications.

Implementation Method 1

the spring body includes a generally annular wall with a first helical spring channel defined therethrough, wherein at least one of the spring bases includes a valve cross-over configured and adapted to allow flow of liquid out from inside the generally annular wall

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a valve cross-over configured and adapted to allow flow of liquid out from inside the generally annular wall through the valve cross-over

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Data Source

PatentEP2597286B1Machined springs for injector applications
Publication Date: 2020.03.04 DELAVAN CORP
  • EP2597286B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2597286B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2597286B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

A machined spring for injector applications includes opposed first and second spring bases separated apart along a longitudinal axis. A spring body connects the first and second spring bases. The spring body includes a generally annular wall with a plurality of spring channels defined therethrough, such as machined channels. Exemplary applications for such machined springs include liquid strainers, valve components, and structural components for accommodating thermal expansion in injectors.