Machining Chatter Monitoring via Sliding-Window Fractal Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for monitoring chatter in machining processes are hindered by high computational complexity, leading to identification lag and difficulties in real-time online monitoring.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the collection of original signals through a sliding window, calculation of fractal dimensions using fractal algorithms, and comparison to identification thresholds to determine chatter occurrence, without the need for signal preprocessing, allowing for low computational complexity and efficient real-time monitoring.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If signal decomposition algorithms (empirical mode decomposition, wavelet decomposition, variational mode decomposition) are used to improve chatter identification accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and computation time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter identification accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential fractal dimension feature from the machining signal using a simplified fractal algorithm, eliminating the need for complex signal decomposition processes. This extraction approach focuses on the most critical characteristic (fractal dimension) that directly correlates with chatter occurrence, thereby reducing computational complexity while maintaining identification accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of decomposing the signal into multiple components and analyzing each separately (conventional approach), the patent inverts the approach by directly calculating the fractal dimension of the original signal. This inversion eliminates the decomposition step entirely, significantly reducing computational burden while preserving the ability to detect chatter accurately.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Measurement precision

If complex signal decomposition and preprocessing steps are performed to improve chatter identification accuracy, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases due to identification lag

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter identification accuracyVSAvoididentification lag
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by directly calculating the fractal dimension from the raw signal without requiring time-consuming preprocessing or decomposition steps. The fractal dimension calculation is designed to be computationally efficient, enabling real-time chatter detection with minimal identification lag while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent skips the intermediate signal decomposition and preprocessing steps that traditionally slow down chatter identification. By rushing through directly to the fractal dimension calculation from the original signal, the method eliminates unnecessary computational delays while preserving the essential information needed for accurate chatter detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Measurement precision

If traditional chatter monitoring methods with high computational complexity are used, then measurement precision may be maintained, but productivity decreases due to slow processing speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechatter identification accuracyVSAvoidreal-time monitoring efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the computational parameters by using a simplified fractal dimension calculation instead of complex signal decomposition algorithms. This parameter change reduces the computational complexity from O(n^2) or higher to a more efficient calculation, enabling real-time processing and significantly improving productivity while maintaining the precision needed for accurate chatter identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11344987B2Method for monitoring chatter in machining process
Publication Date: 2022.05.31 TSINGHUA SHENZHEN INTERNATIONAL GRADUATE SCHOOL
  • US11344987B2 patent drawing
  • US11344987B2 patent drawing
  • US11344987B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for monitoring chatter in a machining process includes the following steps: collecting an original signal related to chatter in the machining process; for the original signal, obtaining a signal segment for calculation and analysis by updating data points in a sliding window with a set step-length, where the step-length refers to a number of data points updated every time in the sliding window, and is not greater than the size of the sliding window; calculating fractal dimensions of the signal segments in the sliding window by using a fractal algorithm; and comparing the calculated fractal dimension with an identification threshold to determine whether chatter occurs in the machining process. The measured signal does not need to be preprocessed by using the method, which can greatly improve calculation efficiency and can ensure accuracy of chatter identification.