Portable Machining Tool Cover Lock for Safe Blade Access

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional plunge-type portable machining apparatuses face issues such as potential damage from erroneous operation of the lock mechanism, increased size due to separate mechanisms for door lock and position lock, and user inconvenience during blade replacement and operation.

Innovation Solution

A portable machining apparatus with a lock operation mechanism that is displaced between blocking and permission positions based on the main body's position, integrated with the open/close mechanism, and a battery mount that prevents operation when not in use, ensuring safe and compact design.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a separate lock mechanism is added to prevent erroneous operation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of erroneous operationVSAvoidstructure of lock mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the door lock function and main body position lock function into a single lock operation mechanism. The mechanism uses the vertical position of the main body portion relative to the cover to automatically control whether the door can be opened, eliminating the need for separate control mechanisms and reducing overall device complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lock operation mechanism serves multiple functions: it locks the door in the closed state, prevents erroneous opening operations, and integrates with the main body position sensing system. This multi-functional design reduces the number of separate components needed and simplifies the overall device structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If a lock operation mechanism is added to prevent erroneous operation, then reliability is improved, but the apparatus size increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of erroneous operationVSAvoidsize of apparatus
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The lock operation mechanism is integrated with the existing open/close mechanism structure. The mechanism utilizes the vertical displacement of the main body portion to control the lock state, sharing structural elements with the door opening/closing system and avoiding the need for additional separate locking components that would increase apparatus volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If the door is always lockable, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates during blade replacement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during operationVSAvoidblade replacement convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The lock state of the door is made dynamic rather than static. The lock operation mechanism automatically changes its locking capability based on the vertical position of the main body portion. When the main body is in the upper position (blade exposed), the door can be opened for blade replacement. When the main body moves to the lower position (blade retracted), the door becomes locked to prevent erroneous opening, thus adapting to different operational states.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanism preliminarily establishes the lock state based on the main body position before any door opening operation is attempted. By sensing the vertical position in advance, the system pre-configures whether the door should be lockable, preventing erroneous operations before they can occur while allowing legitimate blade replacement operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the main body portion is constrained to prevent unintended exposure, then safety is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of unintended tool exposureVSAvoidoperation flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The constraint on the main body portion is made dynamic rather than fixed. The lock operation mechanism allows vertical movement of the main body when the door is in the open state (during blade replacement), but automatically engages a locking constraint when the door is closed and the main body is in the lower position. This dynamic constraint system prevents unintended tool exposure while maintaining operation flexibility during legitimate tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12515370B2Portable machining apparatus
Publication Date: 2026.01.06 MAKITA CORP
  • US12515370B2 patent drawing
  • US12515370B2 patent drawing
  • US12515370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A portable machining apparatus includes a main body, a cover including a cover main body and a door, a door open/close mechanism, and a lock to lock the open/close mechanism in a closed state displaceably supported by the cover main body or the main body portion. The main body is displaceable relative to the cover between a first position entirely containing the tip tool in the cover, and a second position partially exposing the tip tool outside the cover. The lock is manually displaceable between a position blocking the door from opening, and a position permitting the door to open. The lock is displaceable when the main body is at the first position, and is not displaceable by abutment between the other of the cover main body and the main body and the lock operation member when the main body is at a position other than the first position.