Dialogue System for Machining Process Improvement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional dialogue systems for industrial workpiece production rely heavily on subjective operator evaluations, limiting the possibilities for improving quality features, as they do not utilize objective machine tool sensor data and image data, which can lead to suboptimal processing operations.

Innovation Solution

A dialogue system that incorporates input means for operator-defined quality improvements, a proposal module accessing stored expert knowledge, and machine tool sensor data, including image data, to provide objective-based improvement proposals, capable of detecting issues like inadequate adjustments or material discrepancies, thus expanding the search for optimal process parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional dialogue systems rely on subjective operator evaluations, then the system is simple to operate, but the possibilities for finding improvement proposals are limited by operator capabilities and stored expert knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidpossibilities for finding improvement proposals
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces sensor systems and image processing systems as intermediaries between the workpiece and the operator. These systems objectively capture and evaluate quality features, replacing or supplementing subjective operator evaluations. The sensor data acts as a mediator that provides precise, quantifiable information about processing results, enabling the dialogue system to generate improvement proposals based on objective measurements rather than limited human perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If objective sensor data and image data are incorporated into the dialogue system, then the possibilities for finding improvement proposals are expanded, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepossibilities for finding improvement proposalsVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into the dialogue system, including sensor data acquisition, image processing, objective quality evaluation, and improvement proposal generation. The system serves multiple purposes: monitoring processing operations, objectively evaluating quality features, identifying deviations from target values, and generating optimized process parameter proposals. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate systems while expanding the capabilities for finding improvement proposals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual operator evaluation with automated sensor systems and image processing algorithms. Instead of relying on human senses and subjective judgment, the system uses optical sensors, cameras, and computer vision algorithms to objectively measure and evaluate quality features. This substitution of mechanical and human evaluation methods with automated sensing and processing reduces complexity in the evaluation process while expanding analytical capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If subjective operator evaluations are used, then the system requires less sophisticated equipment, but the improvement proposals are limited by operator capabilities

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidmeasurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where sensor systems continuously monitor processing operations and provide objective data about quality features. The dialogue system compares measured values with target values and uses this feedback to generate improvement proposals. This closed-loop feedback system ensures that improvement proposals are based on precise, real-time measurements rather than limited operator perception, enabling continuous optimization of processing operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9529343B2Dialogue system and method for examining machining processes
Publication Date: 2016.12.27 TRUMPF WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US9529343B2 patent drawing
  • US9529343B2 patent drawing
  • US9529343B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dialog system for examining a processing operation carried out on a machine tool and establishing a proposal for improving at least one quality feature of a subsequent processing operation, the dialog system having input means to predetermine the quality feature to be improved and a proposal module which, by accessing stored expert knowledge, can establish at least one proposal for improving the quality feature. In some implementations, the proposal module is operable to read data established by one or more of a machine tool sensor system and image data of a processed workpiece together with associated material and processing data to provide the proposal.