Machining State Display for Balancing Chatter, Cost, and Accuracy

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machining state display apparatuses only show the correlation between spindle rotation speed and limit depth of cut for regenerative chatter, leaving evaluation of other machining-related factors like machining efficiency, costs, and accuracy to operator experiential knowledge, which is insufficient due to their complex 'antinomy' relationships.

Innovation Solution

A machining state display apparatus that allows operators to input desired evaluation items and their required degrees of achievement, using stored data to display corresponding machining conditions and associated degrees of achievement for multiple evaluation items, enabling balanced and efficient machining settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If only stability lobe representing correlation between spindle rotation speed and limit depth of cut is displayed, then operator can recognize relationship between spindle rotation speed and depth of cut which produces no regenerative chatter, but evaluation of other machining-related factors (machining efficiency, costs, accuracy) must depend on operator's experiential knowledge which is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveregenerative chatter preventionVSAvoidmachining efficiency, costs, and accuracy evaluation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple evaluation items (machining efficiency, machining costs, machining accuracy, and regenerative chatter prevention) into a single integrated display system. The display apparatus simultaneously presents the stability lobe diagram and multiple evaluation indicators, allowing operators to comprehensively assess machining conditions without relying solely on experiential knowledge for any single factor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The display apparatus is designed to perform multiple functions: displaying the stability lobe for chatter prevention, evaluating machining efficiency, estimating machining costs, and assessing machining accuracy. This multi-functional system replaces the need for separate evaluation methods and operator expertise across multiple domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Productivity

If machining conditions are adjusted to improve machining efficiency (increasing width of cut, depth of cut, tool rotation speed, and tool feed rate), then machining time is shortened, but power consumption increases and tool life shortens which are factors of increase of machining costs, and machining accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining efficiencyVSAvoidpower consumption and tool life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The display apparatus provides feedback to operators by simultaneously showing how machining conditions affect multiple evaluation items. When operators adjust parameters to improve machining efficiency, the system immediately displays the resulting changes in power consumption, tool life, and machining accuracy, enabling informed decision-making that balances competing objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system evaluates and displays the effects of changing machining parameters (width of cut, depth of cut, tool rotation speed, tool feed rate) on multiple outcomes. By showing the interrelationships between parameters and their effects on efficiency, costs, and accuracy, operators can optimize parameter selections to achieve balanced performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If width of cut and depth of cut and feed rate are increased to improve machining efficiency, then machining time is reduced, but machining accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining timeVSAvoidmachining accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The display apparatus provides immediate feedback on the trade-off between machining time and machining accuracy when operators adjust cutting parameters. By visually presenting both evaluation items simultaneously, the system enables operators to select conditions that achieve acceptable machining time while maintaining required accuracy levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3454146B1Machining state display apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.07.24 DMG MORI CO LTD
  • EP3454146B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3454146B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3454146B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A machining state display apparatus includes an achievement degree data storage (9) storing machining condition data relating to each of sets of machining conditions and achievement degree data relating to degrees of achievement of evaluation items to be obtained in machining under each of the sets of machining conditions, with the machining condition data and the achievement degree data being associated with each other, a display part (2) displaying a set of machining conditions and degrees of achievement of the evaluation items corresponding thereto on a display (5), and an input part (6) inputting a signal for selecting one from the evaluation items and a required degree of achievement for the selected evaluation item. The display part (2) recognizes, based on the selected evaluation item and the required degree of achievement, a set of machining conditions corresponding to the required degree of achievement for the selected evaluation item as well as the degrees of achievement of other evaluation items to be obtained under the set of machining conditions by referring to the achievement degree data storage (9), and displays the recognized degrees of achievement on evaluation-item basis and displays the recognized set of machining conditions.