Machining Parameter Search Using Simulation and Preference Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing parameter adjustment methods for machine tools require significant time and effort to converge on a worker's preference, often necessitating trial and error, and fail to maintain accuracy when the workpiece shape differs from the test program.

Innovation Solution

A parameter adjustment device that includes a feature calculation unit, evaluation index calculation unit, and a first optimal solution search unit to simulate machining operations, infer evaluation index values, and search for parameter sets that optimize machining results in line with worker preferences, using a neural network to learn and adjust parameters.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional trial-and-error parameter adjustment methods are used, then parameter adjustment can be performed, but the adjustment process requires huge amount of time and repeated trial and error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment efficiencyVSAvoidparameter adjustment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the machining process through simulation, allowing parameter adjustment to be performed on the virtual model rather than through repeated physical trial-and-error. The simulation system replicates the machining behavior digitally, enabling fast evaluation of multiple parameter sets without actual machining time consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary simulation and evaluation of parameter sets before actual machining. By pre-evaluating multiple parameter combinations through the virtual machining system, the optimal parameters are determined in advance, avoiding time-consuming trial-and-error during actual production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Measurement precision

If test programs are changed repeatedly to maintain accuracy for different workpiece shapes, then parameter adjustment accuracy is maintained, but the adjustment work must be restarted from the first step

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment accuracyVSAvoidadjustment work time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal simulation system that can handle different workpiece shapes and machining conditions through a single integrated platform. The virtual machining system is designed to be shape-agnostic, allowing the same system to accurately simulate various workpiece geometries without requiring separate test programs or restarting the adjustment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes in the simulation model to adapt to different workpiece shapes. By modifying the input parameters and geometric data in the virtual machining system, the same simulation framework can accurately represent different workpiece configurations, maintaining parameter adjustment accuracy across varying shapes without restarting the process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If a large number of parameters are adjusted to accommodate different machining priorities, then machining preferences can be satisfied, but the adjustment process becomes complicated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining preference adaptabilityVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the simulation system evaluates machining results based on predefined priorities (cycle time, machining accuracy, surface quality) and provides feedback on parameter performance. This automated feedback loop guides the parameter adjustment process, reducing complexity by systematically identifying optimal parameters based on machining priorities rather than requiring manual adjustment of numerous parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The simulation system performs self-evaluation of parameter sets based on machining priorities. Instead of requiring operators to manually adjust and evaluate numerous parameters, the system automatically assesses parameter performance against the specified priorities and identifies optimal settings, reducing the complexity of parameter adjustment while maintaining adaptability to different machining preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20260016807A1Parameter adjustment device and parameter adjustment method
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US20260016807A1 patent drawing
  • US20260016807A1 patent drawing
  • US20260016807A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a parameter adjustment device, the feature calculation unit calculates a feature of machining by simulating an operation of a machine tool from the tool travel command. The evaluation index calculation unit calculates evaluation index values for evaluating a machining result from the feature of machining. The first optimal solution search unit infers the evaluation index values corresponding to a first search command value generation parameter set by using a first learning result, and, by using a result of the inference, searches for command value generation parameter set candidates that simultaneously optimize the respective evaluation index values. The display control unit displays the feature of machining calculated when the command value generation parameter set candidates are set on a command value generation device that generates the tool travel command, and the respective evaluation index values.