Machining Process Generation with Explainable Rule Backgrounds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machining-process generation techniques require workers to understand specialized rules, making it difficult to confirm the adequacy of generated processes, and necessitate time-consuming manual edits to reflect changes in machining processes.

Innovation Solution

A machining-process generation device that includes a process-instance storage section, a process generation section, and a display section to generate and display background information associated with the machining process, allowing for easy confirmation and efficient reflection of changes without requiring extensive effort or time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If an expert system with specialized rules is used to generate machining processes, then automation extent is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates because workers must understand complex rules to confirm process adequacy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated machining process generationVSAvoidprocess validation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a rule explanation generation unit that acts as an intermediary between the expert system and the worker. This unit generates human-readable explanations of which rules were applied and why, making the automated decision-making process transparent and understandable without requiring workers to learn the complex rule set themselves.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to workers by displaying the specific rules that were applied during machining process generation, along with explanations of their meaning and applicability. This feedback mechanism allows workers to verify the adequacy of generated processes without needing to understand the entire rule base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If specialized rules are used for machining process generation, then manufacturing precision is improved through expert knowledge, but device complexity increases due to the rule management system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining process qualityVSAvoidrule system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and separates the rule explanation generation function from the core expert system. The rule explanation generation unit independently processes the applied rules and generates explanations, thereby reducing the complexity burden on the main machining process generation system while preserving manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a simplified representation or copy of the rule application logic that can be easily displayed and understood. Instead of presenting the complex internal rule structure, the system generates simplified explanations that capture the essential reasoning without exposing the full complexity of the rule base.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual editing of rules is required to reflect changes, then adaptability is reduced, but loss of time increases due to the effort required to edit and reconsider rules

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess modification capabilityVSAvoidtime for rule editing
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service mechanism where the system automatically generates updated rule explanations when machining processes are modified. Workers can directly edit the generated explanations or have them automatically regenerated, eliminating the need for manual rule editing while maintaining adaptability to changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary generation of rule explanations and their interrelationships before any modifications are needed. When changes are required, the system can quickly regenerate explanations based on modified processes, avoiding the time-consuming manual rule editing process while maintaining full adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11720086B2Machining-process generation device, and machining-process generation method
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US11720086B2 patent drawing
  • US11720086B2 patent drawing
  • US11720086B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machining-process generation device includes: a process-instance storage section to store therein a process instance that is an instance of a machining process indicating machining details of each machining-operation unit; a process generation section to generate a machining process on a basis of the process instance and a generation condition for the machining process, and to generate background information indicating a background to generation of the machining process, the background information including information of the process instance used to generate the machining process; and a display section capable of displaying the background information on a display device.