Force-Feedback Machining Robot for Accurate Profile Copying

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The accuracy of positioning by a robot is lower than that of a machine tool due to its lower rigidity, limiting its use to processes with moderate machining accuracy and small reaction forces, making it unsuitable for precise cutting operations like profile trimming or pocket machining that require larger machine tools.

Innovation Solution

A robot control system equipped with a force sensor and a rotating mechanism that adjusts the arm's movement based on measured forces to maintain precise control during profile copying, allowing for automatic control of the tool's speed and position to manage reaction forces effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a robot arm is used for profile copying, then the device complexity and cost are reduced, but the positioning accuracy and machining precision deteriorate due to lower rigidity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

A force sensor is integrated into the robot arm to detect reaction forces during machining operations. The control system uses this feedback to automatically adjust the arm's movement and maintain optimal cutting conditions, compensating for the lower rigidity and achieving positioning accuracy comparable to traditional machine tools

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from static, pre-programmed robot movement to dynamic, real-time control where the robot arm's velocity and position are continuously adjusted based on detected reaction forces, enabling adaptive compensation for rigidity limitations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Weight of moving object

If a robot arm with lower rigidity is used, then the device size and cost are reduced, but the ability to handle large reaction forces deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice sizeVSAvoidreaction force handling capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Weight of moving objectVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The force sensor detects reaction forces in real-time, and the control system automatically reduces the robot arm's velocity when excessive force is detected, preventing damage to the less rigid robot arm while maintaining machining capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the operating parameters (velocity, feed rate) of the robot arm based on the detected reaction forces, allowing the use of a smaller, less rigid arm while still handling machining operations that generate large forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Force

If manual copying with a hand router is used, then large reaction forces can be handled, but the productivity and machining consistency deteriorate due to reliance on worker skill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction force handlingVSAvoidmachining consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot system performs self-adjustment by automatically modifying its velocity based on reaction force feedback, eliminating the need for skilled manual operation while maintaining the ability to handle large forces and ensuring consistent machining quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical control system with an automated control system that uses force sensor feedback to regulate the robot arm's movement, substituting human skill with automated sensing and control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables highly accurate machine cutting operations, such as profile trimming and pocket machining, with large reaction forces, even with a less rigid robot arm, achieving machining accuracy comparable to machine tools and improving efficiency by adjusting speeds to prevent excessive force and vibrations.

Implementation Method 1

a force measured by a force sensor configured to measure at least a force applied from the tool to the arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Data Source

PatentUS11338446B2Machining robot and machining method
Publication Date: 2022.05.24 SUBARU CORP
  • US11338446B2 patent drawing
  • US11338446B2 patent drawing
  • US11338446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robot control system according to an embodiment is a control system for a robot comprising an arm, the arm being capable of holding a tool while rotating the tool and capable of moving the tool in at least two-dimensional directions, the arm being equipped with a rotating mechanism provided for the tool. The robot control system comprises a load-acquiring unit and a control-signal-generating unit. The load-acquiring unit is configured to acquire a force measured by a force sensor configured to measure a force applied from the tool to the arm during profile copying performed on a machining object by moving the arm while a copying guide attached to the arm and a copying mold placed on the machining object are kept in contact with each other. The control-signal-generating unit is configured to automatically control the arm by generating a control signal for the arm in accordance with the force acquired by the load-acquiring unit and with control information for the arm regarding the profile copying, and by outputting the control signal to the arm.