Machining State Learning for Workpiece Model Shape Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing machine learning technologies for robot operations struggle to accurately correct workpiece models to match target shapes, leading to errors in machining processes, requiring manual intervention and inefficient error reduction.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning apparatus that observes machining state data and error measurements to learn an optimal correction amount for workpiece models, using state variables to automatically determine the necessary adjustments, thereby simplifying the correction process and improving precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual methods are used to determine correction amounts for workpiece models, then flexibility and adaptability are maintained, but the process is time-consuming and lacks precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror measurement precisionVSAvoidtime for determining correction amount
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical determination methods with an automated learning section that uses machine learning algorithms. The learning section automatically determines correction amounts by learning from machining state data and error measurements, eliminating the need for manual intervention while improving both speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by allowing the learning section to autonomously determine correction amounts without human intervention. The apparatus learns from accumulated data and automatically adjusts workpiece models, making the system self-correcting and eliminating dependency on manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated learning is used to determine correction amounts, then speed and precision are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of error reductionVSAvoidcomplexity of learning system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The learning section serves multiple functions: it learns from machining state data, measures errors, determines correction amounts, and updates workpiece models. This multi-functionality consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single integrated component, improving productivity while managing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The learning section acts as an intermediary between the machining system and the workpiece model correction process. It receives raw machining state data and error measurements, processes this information through machine learning, and outputs correction amounts, thereby simplifying the overall system architecture while enabling automated high-speed operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If correction amounts are determined without learning from machining state data, then the system is simpler, but accuracy and adaptability to various machining conditions deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworkpiece shape accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of data collection and learning system
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by continuously measuring errors between machined workpieces and target shapes, then using this error information along with machining state data to learn and determine correction amounts. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves manufacturing precision by adapting to actual machining conditions while the learning process manages the complexity of data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The learning section performs preliminary learning actions by accumulating and analyzing machining state data and error measurements before actual correction is needed. This preliminary learning enables the system to quickly and accurately determine correction amounts during production, improving manufacturing precision without adding complexity to the real-time correction process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240386297A1Machine learning apparatus, control device, machining system, and machine learning method for learning correction amount of workpiece model
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 FANUC LTD
  • US20240386297A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386297A1 patent drawing
  • US20240386297A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning apparatus capable of reducing an error between a machined workpiece and a target shape when the workpiece is machined based on a workpiece model modeling the target shape of the workpiece. A machine learning apparatus includes a state observation section configured to observe machining state data of a machine tool configured to machine the workpiece, and measurement data of an error between a shape of the workpiece machined by the machine tool based on the workpiece model and the target shape, as a state variable representing a current state of environment in which the workpiece is machined, and a learning section configured to learn the correction amount in association with the error by using the state variable.