Machining Surface Simulation for Quantitative Texture Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional machining surface simulation methods rely on subjective user evaluation, leading to inconsistencies in determining defects and accuracy, as the evaluation depends on the user's viewpoint, skill, and display settings, making it difficult to quantify issues and ensure required accuracy.

Innovation Solution

A simulator and numerical control device that perform machining surface simulations by storing machining position data, calculating surface texture, and evaluating it based on predefined conditions, allowing for quantitative assessment and objective determination of machining accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If visual evaluation by user is used to determine machining surface problems, then the evaluation process is simple and intuitive, but the determination becomes subjective and inconsistent depending on user viewpoint and skill

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process simplicityVSAvoiddetermination consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual visual inspection process with an automated image processing system that captures machining surface images and analyzes them computationally. The system substitutes human subjective judgment with objective algorithmic evaluation, eliminating variability caused by different users while maintaining ease of operation through automated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary image processing system that acts as a mediator between the machining surface and the evaluation process. This intermediary captures the surface through imaging, processes the visual information through algorithms, and provides consistent quantitative results, thereby resolving the contradiction between operational simplicity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If subjective visual evaluation is used, then no complex equipment is needed, but it is difficult to numerically determine whether machining satisfies required accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidaccuracy verification capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces subjective visual assessment with automated image processing algorithms that quantitatively analyze surface features. The system captures images and uses computational methods to extract numerical metrics about machining accuracy, enabling objective verification against required standards without requiring complex physical measurement equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms visual surface information into quantitative parameters through image processing. By converting visual data into numerical metrics that can be compared against accuracy requirements, the system enables precise manufacturing verification while maintaining relatively simple equipment requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If evaluation depends on user skill and display settings, then the process is flexible and adaptable, but the results vary and problematic locations may be missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation flexibilityVSAvoidevaluation consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces human-dependent evaluation with an automated system that applies consistent processing algorithms to all images. The system eliminates variability introduced by different users and display settings while maintaining flexibility through programmable analysis parameters and adaptable image processing routines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent establishes predetermined evaluation criteria and processing parameters before the actual evaluation occurs. By pre-configuring the analysis methodology and consistency standards, the system ensures reliable and repeatable results while maintaining adaptability through adjustable parameters for different machining scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11966209B2Simulator, numerical control device, and simulation method
Publication Date: 2024.04.23 FANUC LTD
  • US11966209B2 patent drawing
  • US11966209B2 patent drawing
  • US11966209B2 patent drawing

AI summary

To make it possible to evaluate quantitatively whether there is a problem on a machining surface. A simulator includes a memory unit that stores machining position data to be used when a machine tool machines a machining-target object, a machining surface simulation unit that uses the machining position data that is stored to perform a simulation of a machining surface, a surface texture calculation unit that calculates a surface texture of the machining surface that is simulated through the simulation of the machining surface, and a machining surface evaluation unit that evaluates the surface texture on the basis of an evaluation condition.