Machining Tab Attachment for Billet Holding

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing 'picture framing' technique for holding components during machining is inefficient due to excess material waste, size limitations, and increased complexity and weight when multiple elements are used, leading to potential strength reduction and corrosion.

Innovation Solution

A method involving determining the outer dimensions of a component, selecting a billet with matching or larger dimensions, and attaching multiple tabs to rigidly fix the billet to a machining table, allowing for efficient machining without excess material and enabling the use of available stock.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If picture framing technique is used to hold component during machining, then component can be securely held on machining table, but excess material is wasted to form frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent holding stabilityVSAvoidexcess material waste
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is segmented into multiple removable tabs that are attached only at specific locations where clamps need to be positioned. Instead of creating a continuous frame around the entire component, tabs are placed selectively at clamp locations, reducing material waste while maintaining holding stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The frame structure is transformed into localized tabs at specific positions rather than a continuous frame. This local quality approach places material only where needed for clamping, eliminating excess material in areas where framing is not required.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If picture framing is used, then component can be held during machining, but technique is limited when stock size is insufficient for both component and frame

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent holding capabilityVSAvoidstock size adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The frame is divided into separate tab elements that can be selectively positioned and attached. This segmentation allows the tabs to be placed on available stock regardless of overall stock dimensions, enabling adaptability to various stock sizes while maintaining holding capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of requiring two-dimensional space for a continuous frame around the component, the solution uses discrete tabs that extend in a third dimension (perpendicular to the component surface). This dimensional change allows tabs to be attached to stock of various sizes without requiring sufficient perimeter material for a complete frame.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Ease of manufacture

If multiple elements are used when stock is insufficient, then component can be machined, but weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemachinabilityVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The tabs are pre-attached to the component before machining begins. This preliminary action of attaching tabs allows the component to be held as a single unit during machining, eliminating the need for complex assembly of multiple elements afterward while maintaining manufacturability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The tabs serve as intermediary elements that provide clamping surfaces without requiring the component itself to be divided into multiple elements. The tabs act as mediators between the clamps and the component, enabling single-element machining while maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple elements are assembled, then component can be formed from smaller stock, but strength is reduced due to joining

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestock size flexibilityVSAvoidcomponent strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The holding function is extracted from the component material itself and placed onto separate tab elements. This extraction allows the component to remain as a single unitary structure without joining, preserving strength while enabling the use of smaller stock through the attached tabs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The tabs serve as intermediary elements that provide the necessary holding surfaces without requiring the component to be divided or joined. The tabs mediate between the clamping requirements and the component integrity, allowing single-piece machining from smaller stock while maintaining component strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS7380321B2Machining technique with selective and localized placement of tooling material
Publication Date: 2008.06.03 THE BOEING CO
  • US7380321B2 patent drawing
  • US7380321B2 patent drawing
  • US7380321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of holding a billet of material (70) to a machining table (106) includes determining a first set of outer dimensions of a component (72) to be machined. The billet of material (70) is selected in response to the first set of outer dimensions to have a second set of outer dimensions. Dimensions of the second set of outer dimensions are approximately equal to or greater than corresponding dimensions of the first set of outer dimensions. Multiple tabs (76) are attached to the billet of material (70). The tabs (76) are rigidly fixed to the machining table (106). A machining system (50) includes a controller (52) that determines a first set of outer dimensions of a component (72) to be machined. A tab-forming mechanism (54) generates multiple tabs (76) that are configured to be rigidly fixed to a machining table (106). An attachment mechanism (56) couples the tabs (76) to a billet of material (70), which has a second set of outer dimensions having the same relation to the first set of outer dimensions previously stated.