Macroporous-structured polymer aerogels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aerogels with mesoporous and/or microporous structures face challenges such as collapse during processing, high production costs, and lack of mechanical durability, which hinder scalability and practical applications.

Innovation Solution

Development of macroporous-structured polymeric aerogels with a significant portion of their pore volume composed of macropores (greater than 50 nm in diameter), which are designed to minimize collapse during drying and enhance mechanical properties.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If mesoporous and/or microporous structured aerogels are prepared, then high porosity and high specific surface area are achieved, but pore collapse during drying and lack of mechanical durability occur

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveporosityVSAvoidmechanical durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pore size parameter from mesoporous/microporous to macroporous structure. This parameter change fundamentally alters the mechanical properties and drying behavior of the aerogel, allowing it to maintain structural integrity while preserving high porosity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite structure combining macroporous framework with embedded microporous regions. This composite approach provides both the mechanical strength of larger pores and the high surface area benefits of smaller pores, resolving the contradiction between durability and porosity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Area of stationary object

If mesoporous and/or microporous structured aerogels are prepared, then high specific surface area is achieved, but production complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecific surface areaVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent simplifies the processing by changing the pore formation mechanism. Instead of requiring complex controlled drying processes for mesoporous structures, the macroporous approach allows for simpler drying protocols while still achieving functional aerogels with adequate surface area for many applications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of substance

If conventional drying processes are used for mesoporous aerogels, then liquid removal is achieved, but pore collapse and xerogel formation occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveliquid removalVSAvoidpore structure integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the pore size parameter to macroporous, which fundamentally alters the drying behavior. The larger pores can tolerate conventional drying processes without collapse, eliminating the need for complex supercritical or freeze drying while maintaining pore structure integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11945929B2Macroporous-structured polymer aerogels
Publication Date: 2024.04.02 BLUESHIFT MATERIALS INC
  • US11945929B2 patent drawing
  • US11945929B2 patent drawing
  • US11945929B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A macroporous-structured polymeric aerogel, and methods for making and using the same, having a polymeric matrix that includes macropores is disclosed.