Hub-and-Spoke Integration Migration for Business Logic Preservation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for migrating integration applications to cloud environments are cumbersome, time-consuming, and prone to errors, often requiring manual intervention and failing to maintain business logic, leading to high costs and inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A system and method utilizing hub and spoke architecture, employing AI-driven assessment and re-factoring to automate the migration process, breaking down application code into macro-services, and repackaging them for compatibility with target environments, while retaining business logic and implementing continuous integration and deployment frameworks.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual migration methods are used to migrate integration applications to cloud environments, then the migration can be completed with existing tools, but the process becomes cumbersome, time-consuming, and prone to errors requiring manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemigration accuracyVSAvoidmigration time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automation where the migration platform automatically performs assessment, code refactoring, macro-service generation, and deployment without requiring manual intervention. The AI engine autonomously analyzes source applications, identifies business logic, and transforms code into target environment-compatible formats, eliminating the need for professional services while maintaining high accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical migration processes with an automated AI-driven system. The AI engine substitutes human analysts and manual code refactoring efforts with intelligent algorithms that automatically assess applications, generate re-factored code, create macro-services, and orchestrate the entire migration workflow, dramatically reducing time while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If professional services are engaged to perform remediation processes during migration, then the migration quality can be maintained, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemigration qualityVSAvoidmigration cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The migration platform performs self-assessment and self-remediation through its AI engine, which automatically identifies issues, generates appropriate corrections, and validates migration quality. This eliminates the need to engage external professional services while maintaining high migration quality through automated testing and validation procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the AI engine monitors migration progress, assesses quality metrics, and automatically adjusts the migration process. The platform provides real-time feedback on migration status, identifies potential issues, and self-corrects problems without human intervention, ensuring high quality while reducing costs by eliminating professional services.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of time

If existing application code is directly migrated without refactoring, then the migration process is faster, but the application logic may be lost or incompatible with the target environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemigration speedVSAvoidbusiness logic preservation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary AI-driven assessment and code analysis before migration, identifying business logic patterns and dependencies in advance. The AI engine pre-processes source code to understand application architecture and logic flows, enabling automated refactoring that preserves business logic while adapting to the target environment, thus maintaining both speed and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual code review and analysis with AI-powered automated code understanding. The AI engine rapidly analyzes source applications, identifies business logic, and generates refactored code automatically, achieving both fast migration speed and high business logic preservation through intelligent automation rather than manual processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the current EAI platform processes large workloads manually, then flexibility can be maintained, but the process becomes error-prone and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess flexibilityVSAvoidmigration efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual EAI platform operations with automated AI-driven processes. The AI engine automatically performs assessment, code refactoring, macro-service generation, and deployment tasks that were previously handled manually, dramatically improving productivity and efficiency while maintaining flexibility through programmable automation that can adapt to different application types and target environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12554480B2System and method for integration application environment migration utilizing hub and spoke architecture
Publication Date: 2026.02.17 HEXAWARE TECHNOLOGIES
  • US12554480B2 patent drawing
  • US12554480B2 patent drawing
  • US12554480B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present subject matter discloses a system and a method for integration application environment migration utilizing hub and spoke architecture. In one implementation, the method for application environment migration including assessing at least one source application code of corresponding integration application environment by a processor (122) of an integration application server. The processor forecasts an assessment statistic (302) that provides at least one functional readiness (304) and a timeline (306) to complete the migration of the each source application code. The processor (122) further scans the each source application code of corresponding source application for generating the integration applications compatible with a target application environment and creates a relationship map to match components of the integrating applications with components of the target application environment. The processor (122) generates a re-factored code for the each source application code by breaking the each source application code into macro-services (426a, . . . , 426n) and repackaging the macro-services (426a, . . . , 426n) in accordance with the target application code. Thereby, updating components of the integration application environment as per the forecasted assessment statistic (302) and the re-factored code and thus migrating the integration application environment to the target application environment while re-platforming the updated components and the re-factored code of the integration application environment to the target application environment.